




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
RiskManagementforMedicalDevicesSafeandEffectiveProductsPaulMcDanielASQCQM/OEExecutiveVPOperationsandQASicelTechnologiesOverviewProductLifeCycleModelRoleProcessHintsIn-depthdiscussionofaRiskManagementAnalyticalTool:FMEARiskManagementDefined
(apractitioner'sdefinition)Risk:probabilityofharmoccurringANDtheseverityofharmRiskManagement:Useofrelevantinformationtoidentifypossibleharmfulevents,toassesstheevent’sacceptabilityintheeye’softheatriskpopulation(probability*severity),andexerteffectivecontrolsoftheriskRiskAnalysis-IntendeduseandIdofCharrelatedtosafetyofthedevice-Idhazards-EstriskforeachhazardoussituationRiskevaluationRiskControl-Optionanalysis-Implementcontrols-Residualriskevaluation-Risk/benefitanalysis-Risksarisingfromcontrolmeasures-CompletenessofriskcontrolRiskAssessmentEvaluationofoverallresidualriskacceptabilityRiskManagementReportProductionandpost-productioninformationRiskManagementAdaptedfromISO14971:2007Figure1ProductLifeCycleModelRoleUnderstandtheRegulatoryModelAproductlifecyclehasmanyphasesInformation/Products/Designatthestartofaphaseisinput;possiblyinputrequirementsInformation/Products/DesignattheendofeachphaseisoutputOutputsmustbeverifiedagainstinputsThemodelassumesverificationateachphaseendProductLifeCycleModelRoleTheCurrentStateoftheRiskManagementStandardAssumestheRegulatorymodelYoumayfollowthedescribedprocessandbeconfusedunlessyourecognizethephaseboundariesHowcanIdeterminetheanswerto“isriskacceptable”ifI’mjustdefiningdesigninputsTheplannedmitigationisacceptable,detaildesignmayintroducenewinformation,stayalertinthenextphase!RiskManagementbyPhaseDesignInput(HazardAnalysis/FaultTree)Focusongeneratingproduct“shallnotdo”or“shallcomplywithstandard...”typeofspecificationrequirementsDetailedDesign(FaultTree/FMEA)LooktoyourproductarchitectureandaddarchitectureinterfaceriskstoyouranalysesFurtheron,examinehigherriskareasandproductfailurerisksindetailRiskManagementbyPhaseDesignVerification/ValidationWatchforoccurrenceofanticipatedbut“intendedtobe”mitigatedrisksRiskControlfailureAssessimpactofV&VfindingsfornewrisksneedinganalysesWedidn’timaginethatwouldhappen:Risk?Listentoanycustomerfeedbackforriskacceptability“Thosesafetylockoutsaretooconfusingtoworkwith,canwedisablethem?”RiskManagementbyPhaseCommercialDistribution/DisposalVigilanceReportingisaRiskAnalysisUpdateOpportunityNEWfor2007!ProductionfeedbackintotheRiskAnalysisAmIseeinghigherratesofoccurrence?Arenewfailuremodespresentingthemselvesthatwehaven’tanalyzed?ArewehavingcontrolfailuresorexcessivecausefailuresRiskAnalysisinProductionNon-conformingmaterialandMaterialReviewBoardProcesses?Cantheyeffectivelyconsiderrisksoneachoccurrence?Controlcharts,acceptancedataAreriskcontrolspartofacceptancetesting?Frequencyofoccurrencesuggestinganything“Riskoffailurewasrankedasremoteyetwe’vehadthreecatastrophichot-pottestfailuresthismonth!”RiskAnalysisinProductionCommentperiod…………ProcessConsiderationsDefinethescopeofyouranalysisWhatsystems,whatinterfaces,whoasuser...Therecordsproducedwillbesubjecttosecondguessingifharmoccurs:don’tallowhindsighttochangetherulesDocumentyourinformationsources!!!!!!!Whenyoumadeyourriskacceptabilitydecision,whatinformationwasavailableandused?Wecanonlybediligent,notpsychicAnalysisScopeIntendedUse:Useforwhichtheproduct,processorserviceisintendedaccordingtothespecifications,instructions,andinformationsuppliedbythemanufacturerEssentialPerformance:PerformancenecessarytoachievefreedomfromunacceptableriskNote:ismosteasilyunderstoodbyconsideringwhetheritsabsenceordegradationwouldresultinanunacceptableriskYoumusthavethesetwoclearlyinfrontoftheanalysisteam.ProcessConsiderationsUseaRiskSourceListasaReminderISO14971hassuchlistsAddyourIndustry’sExperienceIfaharmfuleventhasbeenreported,ithashighermitigationprioritythanhypotheticalrisksflagrealoccurrencesinyouranalysesRelyonacceptedstandardsIfthereisa“test”standard,understandtheunderlyingreasonforthetestsProcessConsiderationsSourcesofharmshouldsuggestactionelectricityisnotharmful,electrocutionisAhazardexistsAsequenceofeventsleadstoahazardoussituation(normalorfaultconditions)Thehazardoussituationhasaprobability(P1)HarmoccursfromthesituationAprobabilityofharmexists(P2)Aseverityofoutcomecanbeassigned(S)Risk=S,P1xP2ProcessConsiderationsWhiledefiningthesysteminputs,whatharmfulthingscanoccur:Veryearlyon,a“PreliminaryHazardAnalysis”canscreenouthigherriskapproachesWhataretheharmfulthingsthatthesystemcandoconsidering:user,patient,environmentorproperty(asubject)ProcessConsiderationsTypically,theDeviceDesignRequirementsAreBrokenDownIntoSmallerPiecesDuringDetailedDesignfocusoninterfaces,signalanddatapathintegritytracesystemrequirementstosub-systemUseFaultTreeAnalysis(topdown)ConsiderUsingFailureModesandEffectsAnalysis(bottomsup)ProcessConsiderationsObserveVerification/ValidationfindingsforunanticipateddevicebehaviorthebestdesignanalystsmissthingsInitiateaprocessforV&Vfindingsclassificationdidharmoccur?,orifthebehaviorre-occurs,couldharmoccur?ifIcan’trecreatethebehavior,IstillmayhavetomitigateitRiskManagementProcessToolsSystemHazardAnalysis
(designinput)DrawboundariesbetweenthesystemandtheatrisksubjectanddefineharmfuleventsEnergysentacrossaboundaryLookforpotentialtokineticenergytransitiondidyoucontrolthetransitionChangesinstatemaybepotentiallyharmfulYourseedlistmayleaveyouwithmany“deferredanswers”ProbabilityandSeverityEstimatesRiskmanagementreliesonexpertjudgmentsodon’tletnovicesworkalone!Focusononedevice,onedevicelifetimeSetQuantitativeorQualitativecriteriahighprobabilityis...severaltimesinadevicelifetime???,1<permillionusesmoderateinjuryis....medicalattentiontoreturntopre-riskexposurestateProbabilityandSeverity
(usegraphicaltechniques)IncreasingSeverityIncreasingprobabilityunacceptableokayIncreasingSeverityIncreasingprobabilitynoriskortoogreatariskiseasy,whataboutmoderaterisks?SplitupthequadrantstorefinetheestimatesinstagesofanalysisDetailedRiskAnalysesOneofthemorepopulardesignevaluationtoolsistheFailureModesandEffectsAnalysis(FMEA)IEC60812,Analysistechniquesforsystemreliability-ProcedureforfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisFMEAisusedmorefordesignevaluationthanfordesigndevelopmentWorksformanufacturingprocessestoo!DetailedRiskAnalysesDefinitions:FMEA:astructuredanalyticaltechniquewhichdeterminesrelationshipsbetweenbasicelementfailurecharacteristicsandthesystemfailuresFailuremodeishowafailuremanifestsitself(systemshutsdown)Failuremechanismiswhyafailureoccurs(defectinthetransistorsilicon)ProcessNeedsforaFMEAPriorriskanalysisworktobuildonifavailableSystemlevelharmfuleventswillbeanalyzedtoseehowcomponent/assembliesmaycontributetotheharmcauseSystemfailureanddegradedmodesdefinitionsfunctionalblockdiagramsmaybeneededforeachoperating/failuremodeFMEAProcessNeedsadesignsolution,downtothecomponent
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 農(nóng)藝師考試中對專業(yè)知識應用能力的提升策略與具體實踐試題及答案
- 2024年農(nóng)藝師考試職業(yè)價值觀試題及答案
- 小眾智商測試題及答案
- 2024年福建事業(yè)單位考試學習過程中的心理建設試題及答案
- 2024年統(tǒng)計師考試的知識框架 試題及答案
- 高校輔導員如何提高問題識別能力試題及答案
- 2024年農(nóng)藝師考試模擬題集 相關(guān)試題及答案
- 輔導員招聘考試時間安排與自我調(diào)控試題及答案
- 吃雞游戲測試題及答案
- 2024年輔導員考試參考試題及答案
- 2.6《古代生物的多樣性》教學課件
- 口才技巧之一交談技巧課件
- 2022年南京鐵道職業(yè)技術(shù)學院單招英語試題及答案解析
- 輔警面試考試題題庫及答案(完整版)
- 卡通兒童閱讀心得讀書體會課件
- 唐氏綜合征(先天愚型)培訓教學課件
- 某連鎖藥店的營銷策略研究
- 中小跨徑橋梁結(jié)構(gòu)健康監(jiān)測技術(shù)講稿PPT(107頁)
- HG第四章顯示儀表
- 二五公式驗光法
- 車庫建筑設計規(guī)范《車庫建筑設計規(guī)范》JGJ100-2015修訂對照表(2022)
評論
0/150
提交評論