【源版】Risk-Management-for-Medical-Devices-ASQ-Raleigh:醫(yī)療器械的風險管理-ASQ羅利_第1頁
【源版】Risk-Management-for-Medical-Devices-ASQ-Raleigh:醫(yī)療器械的風險管理-ASQ羅利_第2頁
【源版】Risk-Management-for-Medical-Devices-ASQ-Raleigh:醫(yī)療器械的風險管理-ASQ羅利_第3頁
【源版】Risk-Management-for-Medical-Devices-ASQ-Raleigh:醫(yī)療器械的風險管理-ASQ羅利_第4頁
【源版】Risk-Management-for-Medical-Devices-ASQ-Raleigh:醫(yī)療器械的風險管理-ASQ羅利_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩25頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

RiskManagementforMedicalDevicesSafeandEffectiveProductsPaulMcDanielASQCQM/OEExecutiveVPOperationsandQASicelTechnologiesOverviewProductLifeCycleModelRoleProcessHintsIn-depthdiscussionofaRiskManagementAnalyticalTool:FMEARiskManagementDefined

(apractitioner'sdefinition)Risk:probabilityofharmoccurringANDtheseverityofharmRiskManagement:Useofrelevantinformationtoidentifypossibleharmfulevents,toassesstheevent’sacceptabilityintheeye’softheatriskpopulation(probability*severity),andexerteffectivecontrolsoftheriskRiskAnalysis-IntendeduseandIdofCharrelatedtosafetyofthedevice-Idhazards-EstriskforeachhazardoussituationRiskevaluationRiskControl-Optionanalysis-Implementcontrols-Residualriskevaluation-Risk/benefitanalysis-Risksarisingfromcontrolmeasures-CompletenessofriskcontrolRiskAssessmentEvaluationofoverallresidualriskacceptabilityRiskManagementReportProductionandpost-productioninformationRiskManagementAdaptedfromISO14971:2007Figure1ProductLifeCycleModelRoleUnderstandtheRegulatoryModelAproductlifecyclehasmanyphasesInformation/Products/Designatthestartofaphaseisinput;possiblyinputrequirementsInformation/Products/DesignattheendofeachphaseisoutputOutputsmustbeverifiedagainstinputsThemodelassumesverificationateachphaseendProductLifeCycleModelRoleTheCurrentStateoftheRiskManagementStandardAssumestheRegulatorymodelYoumayfollowthedescribedprocessandbeconfusedunlessyourecognizethephaseboundariesHowcanIdeterminetheanswerto“isriskacceptable”ifI’mjustdefiningdesigninputsTheplannedmitigationisacceptable,detaildesignmayintroducenewinformation,stayalertinthenextphase!RiskManagementbyPhaseDesignInput(HazardAnalysis/FaultTree)Focusongeneratingproduct“shallnotdo”or“shallcomplywithstandard...”typeofspecificationrequirementsDetailedDesign(FaultTree/FMEA)LooktoyourproductarchitectureandaddarchitectureinterfaceriskstoyouranalysesFurtheron,examinehigherriskareasandproductfailurerisksindetailRiskManagementbyPhaseDesignVerification/ValidationWatchforoccurrenceofanticipatedbut“intendedtobe”mitigatedrisksRiskControlfailureAssessimpactofV&VfindingsfornewrisksneedinganalysesWedidn’timaginethatwouldhappen:Risk?Listentoanycustomerfeedbackforriskacceptability“Thosesafetylockoutsaretooconfusingtoworkwith,canwedisablethem?”RiskManagementbyPhaseCommercialDistribution/DisposalVigilanceReportingisaRiskAnalysisUpdateOpportunityNEWfor2007!ProductionfeedbackintotheRiskAnalysisAmIseeinghigherratesofoccurrence?Arenewfailuremodespresentingthemselvesthatwehaven’tanalyzed?ArewehavingcontrolfailuresorexcessivecausefailuresRiskAnalysisinProductionNon-conformingmaterialandMaterialReviewBoardProcesses?Cantheyeffectivelyconsiderrisksoneachoccurrence?Controlcharts,acceptancedataAreriskcontrolspartofacceptancetesting?Frequencyofoccurrencesuggestinganything“Riskoffailurewasrankedasremoteyetwe’vehadthreecatastrophichot-pottestfailuresthismonth!”RiskAnalysisinProductionCommentperiod…………ProcessConsiderationsDefinethescopeofyouranalysisWhatsystems,whatinterfaces,whoasuser...Therecordsproducedwillbesubjecttosecondguessingifharmoccurs:don’tallowhindsighttochangetherulesDocumentyourinformationsources!!!!!!!Whenyoumadeyourriskacceptabilitydecision,whatinformationwasavailableandused?Wecanonlybediligent,notpsychicAnalysisScopeIntendedUse:Useforwhichtheproduct,processorserviceisintendedaccordingtothespecifications,instructions,andinformationsuppliedbythemanufacturerEssentialPerformance:PerformancenecessarytoachievefreedomfromunacceptableriskNote:ismosteasilyunderstoodbyconsideringwhetheritsabsenceordegradationwouldresultinanunacceptableriskYoumusthavethesetwoclearlyinfrontoftheanalysisteam.ProcessConsiderationsUseaRiskSourceListasaReminderISO14971hassuchlistsAddyourIndustry’sExperienceIfaharmfuleventhasbeenreported,ithashighermitigationprioritythanhypotheticalrisksflagrealoccurrencesinyouranalysesRelyonacceptedstandardsIfthereisa“test”standard,understandtheunderlyingreasonforthetestsProcessConsiderationsSourcesofharmshouldsuggestactionelectricityisnotharmful,electrocutionisAhazardexistsAsequenceofeventsleadstoahazardoussituation(normalorfaultconditions)Thehazardoussituationhasaprobability(P1)HarmoccursfromthesituationAprobabilityofharmexists(P2)Aseverityofoutcomecanbeassigned(S)Risk=S,P1xP2ProcessConsiderationsWhiledefiningthesysteminputs,whatharmfulthingscanoccur:Veryearlyon,a“PreliminaryHazardAnalysis”canscreenouthigherriskapproachesWhataretheharmfulthingsthatthesystemcandoconsidering:user,patient,environmentorproperty(asubject)ProcessConsiderationsTypically,theDeviceDesignRequirementsAreBrokenDownIntoSmallerPiecesDuringDetailedDesignfocusoninterfaces,signalanddatapathintegritytracesystemrequirementstosub-systemUseFaultTreeAnalysis(topdown)ConsiderUsingFailureModesandEffectsAnalysis(bottomsup)ProcessConsiderationsObserveVerification/ValidationfindingsforunanticipateddevicebehaviorthebestdesignanalystsmissthingsInitiateaprocessforV&Vfindingsclassificationdidharmoccur?,orifthebehaviorre-occurs,couldharmoccur?ifIcan’trecreatethebehavior,IstillmayhavetomitigateitRiskManagementProcessToolsSystemHazardAnalysis

(designinput)DrawboundariesbetweenthesystemandtheatrisksubjectanddefineharmfuleventsEnergysentacrossaboundaryLookforpotentialtokineticenergytransitiondidyoucontrolthetransitionChangesinstatemaybepotentiallyharmfulYourseedlistmayleaveyouwithmany“deferredanswers”ProbabilityandSeverityEstimatesRiskmanagementreliesonexpertjudgmentsodon’tletnovicesworkalone!Focusononedevice,onedevicelifetimeSetQuantitativeorQualitativecriteriahighprobabilityis...severaltimesinadevicelifetime???,1<permillionusesmoderateinjuryis....medicalattentiontoreturntopre-riskexposurestateProbabilityandSeverity

(usegraphicaltechniques)IncreasingSeverityIncreasingprobabilityunacceptableokayIncreasingSeverityIncreasingprobabilitynoriskortoogreatariskiseasy,whataboutmoderaterisks?SplitupthequadrantstorefinetheestimatesinstagesofanalysisDetailedRiskAnalysesOneofthemorepopulardesignevaluationtoolsistheFailureModesandEffectsAnalysis(FMEA)IEC60812,Analysistechniquesforsystemreliability-ProcedureforfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisFMEAisusedmorefordesignevaluationthanfordesigndevelopmentWorksformanufacturingprocessestoo!DetailedRiskAnalysesDefinitions:FMEA:astructuredanalyticaltechniquewhichdeterminesrelationshipsbetweenbasicelementfailurecharacteristicsandthesystemfailuresFailuremodeishowafailuremanifestsitself(systemshutsdown)Failuremechanismiswhyafailureoccurs(defectinthetransistorsilicon)ProcessNeedsforaFMEAPriorriskanalysisworktobuildonifavailableSystemlevelharmfuleventswillbeanalyzedtoseehowcomponent/assembliesmaycontributetotheharmcauseSystemfailureanddegradedmodesdefinitionsfunctionalblockdiagramsmaybeneededforeachoperating/failuremodeFMEAProcessNeedsadesignsolution,downtothecomponent

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論