1、 德信誠培訓網危險源識別及風險評價控制程序Hazard source identification and risk evaluation control procedure（ISO45001：2017）1.目的Purpose: 對本公司能夠控制和可望施加影響的危險因素進行辨識和評價，并從中評價出重要危害因素，為建立職業健康安全目標指標實施運行控制和改善安全衛生行為提供依據。To identify and evaluate the controllable and excepted and influenced hazard aspects, identify the important ha

2、zard aspect, provide the reference for the establishment of the occupational health and safety objectives and the implementation of the operational control and the improvement of safety and health behavior. 2.適用范圍Application scope:本程序適用于公司產品、活動及服務等危害辨識和危險評價。It is applicable to the hazard identificat

3、ion and evaluation for the companys products, activities, services and etc. 3.定義Definition：無 N/A4.職責Responsibility:4.1 各部門：負責辨識和評價本部門的危害因素。4.1 Each Department: To identify and evaluate the hazard aspect within the department. 4.2 人力資源部：負責辨識和評價相關方的危害因素及危險因素的匯總審核組織評價和確定重要危險因素各部門協助。4.2 Human Resources

4、dept. : To summarize and review the identification and evaluation of the related hazard aspect and risk aspect and organize to evaluate and define the important risk aspect, coordinate with each dept. 4.3 管理者代表：負責重要危害因素評價結果的審批。4.3 Management Representative: To approve the result of the important ris

5、k aspect evaluation. 5.程序Operational procedure:5.1危害因素的辨識與風險評價Risk aspect identification and risk evaluation5.1.1危害因素的辨識與評價范圍分兩大部分：5.1.1 The scope of the risk aspect identification and evaluation including two parts:5.1.1.1 公司內部：即公司各部門自身的日常活動及有行政管理活動范圍。5.1.1.1 Internal of the company: The daily acti

6、vities of the company's various departments and administrative activities.5.1.1.2 相關方：即公司對行政管轄區域內建筑施工或供貨商等可施加影響的活動產品服務范圍。5.1.1.2 The related parties: the activities, products and services scope can be affected by the construction or suppliers etc. within the administrative jurisdiction of the co

7、mpany .5.1.2 各部門首先應按照本程序的內容和要求，分別識別出內部自身的和對口業務相關方的能夠控制和可施加影響的危害因素，并加以判斷評價出具有重大危害影響或可能具有重大危害影響的因素。辨識和評價的結果應分別填寫在危害辨識與風險評價清單上經部門負責人審核確認后上交人力資源部。5.1.2 Firstly each department, based on the content and requirements of this procedure, separately identify the hazard factors from their own and interface bu

8、siness related parties can control and give the influence and to judge and determine the factors with significant impacts or possible have significant impact; the identification and evaluation results should be separately filled in the “hazard identification and risk evaluation list”, and provided t

9、o human resources department after checked by the department responsible staff. 5.1.3 安全主任對各部門上交的結果進行復核，必要時加以補充，將最終整理出的結果填寫危害辨識與風險評價清單，交管理者代表審核。5.1.3 Safety Officers re-check the results from each department, if necessary, provide some supplement; and finalize the results in the “hazard identificati

10、on and risk evaluation list” to management representative for approval; 5.1.4 各部門將本部門確認后的危害辨識及風險評價清單留存一份，向本部門的員工進行宣傳，以便明確本部門的危害因素對其加以控制和施加影響。5.1.4 Each department should keep one copy of the confirmed hazard identification and risk evaluation list and publicize it to their employees to clarify the d

11、epartment's hazard factors and then control and affect them;5.1.5 危害辨識與風險評價工作每年進行一次，由人力資源部組織進行。5.1.5 Hazard Identification and risk evaluation should be organized by human resource department and conducted once per year; 5.1.6 各部門在發生以下情況時應重新辨識與評價危害因素，及時更新：5.1.6 each department should re-identify

12、 and re-evaluate the hazard factors and update it timely for the following cases: 5.1.6.1 管理體系或產品、活動及服務發生重大變化（增加或減少）。5.1.6.1 significant change(increase or decrease) for the management system or products , activities and services.5.1.6.2 有關的安全法律、法規修訂或廢止。5.1.6.2 the relevant safety legal and regulato

13、ry are amended or repealed.5.1.6.3 本公司的發展規劃作調整或開發建設發生較大變化。5.1.6.3 adjust the companys development plan or bigger change for the development and construction5.1.6.4 定期測量結果發生變化。5.1.6.4 results change for the periodical measurement;5.1.6.5 材料、設施或設備發生變更。5.1.6.5 materials, facilities or equipment change5

14、.1.6.6 發生了緊急情況或安全事故。5.1.6.6 undergone emergency or security incidents.5.1.6.7 相關方有建議或抱怨。5.1.6.7 suggestion or complaint from the related parties;5.1.6.8 重新辨識和評價危害因素的程序按5.1.15.1.25.1.35.1.4款進行。5.1.6.8 re- identification and evaluation of risk factors according to the clause 5.1.1,5.1.2,5.1.3,5.1.4;5.

15、2 在進行危害因素評價時應考慮以下方法：各部門負責人對各自辨識出的危害因素逐一進行評價，評價時可采用是非判斷法作業條件危險評價法進行。5.2 When conduct the risk factors evaluation, should consider the following methods: each department responsible staff should evaluate their own identified risk factors one by one, can use the yes-no judgment method and operation con

16、dition risk evaluation method for implementation; 5.2.1 是非判斷法。凡屬于以下情況之一者就可以直接評價為重要危害因素5.2.1 Yes-no judgment method. Where belongs to one of the following can be directly evaluated as significant risk factors :5.2.2 違反相關的國家或地方法律法規的要求。5.2.2 in violation of the requirements of the relevant national or

17、local legal and regulatory;5.2.3 可能在緊急情況下產生重大危害影響或人員傷亡的。5.2.3 likely to generate significant hazard impacts or injuries in case of emergency.5.2.4 違反相關方的合理要求或相關方有嚴重的合理抱怨的。5.2.4 in violation of the reasonable demands of related parties or reasonable complaints from related parties.5.2.5 作業條件危險評價法。不能用

18、是非判斷法直接評價的，可以采用半定量計算法，也即作業條件危險評價法，計算每種危險源所帶來的風險采用如下方法：D=LEC L發生事故的可能性大小。將發生事故可能性極小的分數定為0.1，而必然要發生的事故的分數定為10，介于這兩種情況指定為若干間值，如下表：5.2.5 Operation conditions risk evaluation method; when can not make the direct evaluation with yes-no judgment method, can use the semi-quantitative calculation method, tha

19、t is operation condition risk evaluation method, to calculate the hazard posed by each risk using the following method : D = LEC L-possibility of accidents occurrence; define the value for the very small possibility of the incidents occurrence as 0.1 , and the values for the incident is bound to be

20、occurred as 10 , between these two cases define a number of specified values as the following table:分數值Value事故發生的可能性possibility for incidents occurrence10完全可以預料Is fully expected6相當可能Is likely to3可能、但不經常Possible, but not often1可能性較小、完全意外Less likely , totally unexpected0.5很不可能、可能設想Very unlikely , is p

21、ossible to envisage0.2極不可能Highly unlikely0.1實際不可能Practically impossibleE暴露于危險環境的頻繁程度。人員出現在危險環境中的時間越多則危險性越大。連續出現在危險環境情況定為10非常罕見地出現在危險環境中定為0.5介于兩者之間的各種情況規定若干個中間值如下表：E- frequency to exposed in hazardous environment. more time the person is exposed in hazardous environment, the risk is greater. Define t

22、he case that is continuously exposed in the hazardous environment as 10 , very rarely exposed in hazardous environments as 0.5; and define a number of intermediate values for the cases between those two cases; the as following table shown:暴露于危險環境中頻繁程度frequency to exposed in hazardous environments（E）

23、分數值Value頻繁程度Frequency10連續暴露Continuous exposure6每天工作時間內暴露Daily working hours within the exposure3每周一次，或偶然暴露Once a week, or accidental exposure2每月一次暴露Monthly time exposure1每年幾次暴露Several times a year exposed0.5非常罕見的暴露Very rare exposureC發生事故產生的后果。事故造成的人身傷害與財產損失變化范圍極大所以規定分數值為1100把需要救護的輕微傷害或較小財產損失分數規定為1其它

24、情況數值為1100之間如下表C- accident consequences; since the change range for the accidents caused personal injury and property damage is great, define the score range from 1 to 100; to define the score for the minor injury needed for ambulance or minor property as 1; for other situations, the value is between

25、 1 and 100 , the following table :發生事故產生的后果(C)Accident consequences occurs分數值Value發生事故產生的后果Accident consequences occurs100大災難許多人死亡A major disaster , many people were killed40災難數人死亡Disaster , the number of people were killed15非常嚴重一人死亡Very serious , one death7嚴重重傷A serious , serious injuries3重大致殘Mater

26、ial , disability1引人注目需要救護Compelling need ambulance5.2.6危險等級劃分Hazard classification依據風險值D來確定風險級別而這個界限值并不是長期固定不變在不同時期應根據其具體情況來確定風險級別的界限值以符合持續改進的思想。下表內容可作為風險級別界限值的參考。Based on the risk value D to determine the risk level, and this valued is not a long-term fixed, at different times, according to their s

27、pecific situation to determine the risk level value to meet the continuous improvement of ideas. The table contents can be used as the reference risk level threshold.危險等級劃分（D）Hazardous classificationD值Value危險程度The degree of risk320極其危險，不能繼續作業Extremely dangerous and can not continue operations160320高

28、度危險需立即整改High-risk , requiring immediate rectification70160顯著危險需要整改Significant danger, require corrective action 2070一般危險需要注意General, need to pay attention20稍有危險可以接受Slightly dangerous , can accept5.2.7根據D值決定危害因素是否為可接受的風險D值在70分以下的危害因素為可接受的危險D值在70分以上者為不可接受的風險并將其劃分為三級第三級最重要不可接受的風險須作優先等級鑒定。列為最優先等級。5.2.7

29、according to D value determine whether risk factors is an acceptable risk or not: D value less than 70 points as the acceptable risk , D value more than 70 points as an unacceptable risk , and divide it into three grade , third grade the most important and unacceptable level risk should be determine

30、d the priority, to rank as highest priority level.a第一級320分以上必須立即采取行動。不符合安全法規要求或根據外部團體所關注的問題同時也列作第一級優先評定。a first level : 320 points or more , must take immediate action . Do not meet safety regulatory, or under external groups ' concerns , and also classified as first -class priority.b第二級160320分的列入近期或中期目標指標改善。b Second level : 160 320 points , included in the short or medium-term objectives and targets improvement.c第三級70160分的不立即采取行動列入運作控制并入目標指標改善。c Third level : 70 to 160 p