議介紹段+段+結尾段輕松搞定6-6.52200202/101//2141/24To

what

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree?糟糕的心路歷程1.

我到底要贊同還是不贊同啊！！！2.

要不哪邊好寫就寫哪邊吧！3.

(寫了100詞以后)

！寫不下去了！4.

要不把兩邊都寫了吧！5.

！我到底贊不贊同啊！6.

不管了，反正都

到了！2200202/101//2141/24糟糕的心路歷程錯誤寫法1：1.

介紹段2.

贊同者認為…3.

者認為…4.

我認為錯誤寫法2：1.

介紹段2.

誠然,一些人認為…….3.

然而,我認為…….4.

綜上所述2200202/101//2141/24整篇文章只能講解你自己的觀點或者陳述事實，絕對不要花大量筆墨去別人的看法。2200202/101//2141/24三種可能的個人觀點yagree---順著題目寫咯(出現的幾率最低，因為題目中經常出現極1.comple端限定詞)2.comple y

disagree---逐一反駁咯(比較高的可能性，懟起來很爽。但是你的懟人能力有限。)3.

一分為二地來看問題(其實相當于部分贊同partly

agree，但我要求盡可能是一個明確的個人觀點，要求比較高的掌控力)1).

我認為題目中一部分對，另一部分錯(題目中必須出現and

連接了兩個部分)2).

題目說的太籠統，我認為應該分人或者分情況(別亂用，一定要確保有明確的劃分標準)2200202/101//2141/24完全贊同的寫法并不常見，最主要的原因是 出題的時候經常在題目里設定

限定詞，這就導致完全贊同的寫顯得比較膚淺。但是，大家最好還是把完全贊同的邏輯藏在某個小角落，萬一有時候能用到呢。2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/241.改寫觀點，然后表達完全贊同；2.

贊同理由-13.贊同理由-24.

贊同理由-35.In

conclusion,重復自己的觀點.2200202/101//2141/24Some

people

think

that

unpaid

community

serviceshould

be

a

compulsory

part

of

high

schoolprogrammes

(such

as

working

for

a

charity,improving

the

neighbourhood

or

teaching

sports

toyoung

children).To

what

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree?2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/24Some

people

have

benefited

from

modern

communicationtechnology,

but

some

groups

of

people

have

not

benefited

atall.Towhat

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree?The

21st

century

has

seen

a

large

number

of

changes

that

are our

wildestexpectations.

One

of

these

advances

is

the

rapid

developmentof

communicationstechnology.

The

advantages

of

convenienceand

high

efficiency

brought

by

digitalcommunication

are

obvious,

but

I

do

not

think

that

everyone

has

access

to

these

benefits.Digital

forms

of

communication

enable

many

people,

mainly

including

students,

families

aswell

as

entrepreneurs,

to

reap

the um

benefits.

From

an

educational

,learning

can

be

incredibly

efficient

and

effective,

as

students

having

the

internet

connectioncan

virtually

solve

all

their

puzzles

by

browsing

teaching

websites

or

asking

for

help

fromteacherssimultaneously.

Internet-based

communication

also

contributes

positively

tostrengthening

family

relationships

and

increasing

closeness

between

family

members.

Forexample,

students

who

attend

boarding

schools

or

study

a re

able

to

keep

in

dailycontact

easily

with

parents

by

sending

greeting

messages

or

camera

chatting.

What

is

more,companies

can

be

run

at

a

much

lower

cost

because

the

internet

and

computers

help

toexpand

business

cheaply

and

because

information

technology

allows

employees

to

work

athome,

which

saves

most

of

the

rents

for

office

space.2200202/101//2141/24However,

I

would

argue

that

the

benefits

of

information

and

communicationtechnology

are

restricted

to

certain

groups

of

users.

In

other

words,

some

people,particularly

the

old

and

thepoor,

are

not

beneficiaries

of

modern

ways

ofcommunication.

With

regard

to

the

former,

a

large

percentage

of

elderly

peopleare

unable

and

reluctant

to

adapt

to

new

technology,

whi eans

that

theybarely

enjoy

the

convenience

and

fun

brought

by

the

devices.

As

for

peoplelivingin

extreme

poverty,

mobile

phones,computers

and

any

other

electronic

devicesare

luxuries.All

web-based

activities

mean

nothing

to

them,

neither

makingthemrelaxed

nor

providing

them

with

careeropportunities.In

conclusion,

I

agree

with

the

idea

that

technological

advances

in

information

andcommunication

have

only

broughtbenefits

to

a

certain

group

of

people,

eventhough

it

is

a

large

group.2200202/101//2141/24完全不贊同邏輯的使用比例比完全贊同多得多，這是因為有的題目讀起來簡直喪心病狂。作為作者，只想懟死這個提出觀點的人，所以就直接針對題目里的各個點進行反駁就好。反駁的可能邏輯：這會帶來影響；這么做；這么做不現實；2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/241.

改寫觀點，然后表達完全不贊同；2.

不贊同理由-13.

不贊同理由-24.

不贊同理由-35.

In

conclusion,重復自己的觀點.2200202/101//2141/24Some

people

believe

that

wild

animals

have

no

placein

the

21st

century,

so

protecting

them

is

a

waste

ofresources.

To

what

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree?Some

people

argue

that

it

is

pointless

to

spend

money

on

the

protection

of

wildanimals

because

we

humans

have

no

need

for

them.I

comple

y

disagree

withthis

point

of

view.In

my

opinion,

itis

absurd

to

argue

that

wild

animals

have

no

place

in

the

21stcentury.

I

do

not

believe

that

planet

Earth

exists

only

for

the

benefit

of

humans,and

there

is

nothing

special

about

this

particular

century

that

means

that

wesuddenly

have

the

right

to

allow

or

encourage

the

extinction

of

any

species.Furthermore,

there

is

nocompelling

reason

why

we

should

let

animals

die

out.Wedo

not

need

to

exploit

or

destroy

every

last

squaremetre

of

land

in

order

to

feedor modate

the

world’s

population.

There

is

plenty

of

room

for

us

to

existside

by

side

with

wild

animals,

and

thisshould

beour

aim.2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/24I

also

disagree

with

the

idea

thatprotecting

animals

is

a

waste

of

resources.

Itisusually

the

protection

of

naturalhabitats

that

ensures

the

survival

of

wild

animals,and

most

scientists

agree

that

these

habitats

are

also

crucial

for

humansurvival.For

example,

rainforests

produce

oxygen,

absorb

carbon

dioxide

and

stabilise

theEarth’s

climate.

If

we

destroyed

theseareas,

the

costs

of

managing

the

resultingchanges

to

our

planet

would

far

outweighthecosts

of

conservation.

By

protectingwild

animals

and

theirhabitats,

we

maintain

the

naturalbalance

of

all

life

on

Earth.In

conclusion,

we

have

no

right

to

decidewhether

or

not

wild

animals

should

exist,and

I

believe

that

we

shoulddoeverything

we

can

to

protect

them2200202/101//2141/24Some

people

think

that

companies

should

havethe

samenumber

of

male

and

female

employees.

To

what

extent

doyou

agree

or

disagree?It

is

undeniable

that

men

and

women

should

have

equalaccess

to

job

opportunities.

However,

I

comple y

disagreewith

the

idea

that

the

number

of

males

and

females

in

acompany

should

be

exactly

the

same.

of

all,

many

companies

are

more

attractive

to

one

genderthan

the

other,

so

the

number

of

job

applicants

is

highly

likelyto

be

one-sided,

meaning

that

it

is

almost

impossible

torecruit

the

sa mber

from

both

sexes.

For

example,

acompany

engaging

in

the

construction

industry

will

receivemost

of

applications

from

men,

with

few

women

interested

inits

positions.

As

a

result,

having

the

sa mber

of

menandwomen

in

such

a

company

seemsunrealistic.2200202/101//2141/24Another

reason

why

I

am

against

the

given

opinion

is

that

it

is

likely

thatwork

efficiency

of

a

company

adopting

such

a

policy

will

be

negativelyaffected.

This

is

because

males

outperform

females

in

certain

jobs,

andvice

versa.

For

example,

if

a

private

hospital

had

a

sa mber

of

maleand

female

nurses,

there

would

be

a

lot

of

complaints

as

a

result

of

thesignificantdifference

between

men

and

women

in

terms

of

their

abilitiesto

take

care

of

patients.?Finally,

although

an

equal

number

of

employees

of

each

sex

seeminglymakes

positive

contributions

to

improving

gender

equality

in

the

jobmarket,

it

is

simply

unfair

to

base

employment

for

a

position

on

the

gender

of

an

applicant.

If

a

malecandidate

is

the

best

choice

for

a

positionin

a

company,

it

is

surely

wrong

to

reject

him

infavour

of

a

female

withlower

competence

and

fewer

qualifications.

Companies

should

treat

allcandidates

fairly

by

considering

their

work

experience,

expertise

and

social

skills,

etc.,

rather

than

their

gender.2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/24In

conclusion,

the

selection

of

employees

should

bebased

on

factors

that

represent

a

candidate’squalities

and

qualifications.

It

would

becounterproductive

to

make

a

selection

decision

ongender.?.Individuals

can

do

nothing

to

change

society.

Newdevelopments

can

be

only

brought

about

byernments

and

large

institutions.

To

what

extent

doyou

agree

or

disagree??.2200202/101//2141/24Opinions

are

divided

on

whether

it

is

possible

for

individuals

to

makechanges

to

society.

I

believe

there

are

many

examples

of

individual

scientists,inventors

or

even

political

activistswho

have

made

significant

contributionswhich

have

benefited

their

societies

or

mankind

in

general.

Therefore,

Icomple y

disagree

with

the

given

statement.One

fieldin

which

individuals

have

made

positive

changes

is

that

of

science,examples

of

which

are

medicine

and

electricity.

With

regard

to

the

former,

aBritish

scientists

called

Sir

Alexander

Fleming

accidentally

discoveredpenicillin

when

he

noticed

that

bacteria

could

not survive

near

certain

fungi.This

discovery,the antibiotic,

has

saved

millions

of

lives.

As

far

aselectricity

is

concerned,

perhaps

the

greatestscientist

of

all

was

Nicola

Tesla,without

whose

inventions

in

this

field

we

might

not

have

the

safe

system

ofdistributing

electricity

by

alternating

current

that

we

have

today.

Among

hisother

inventions

were

radio

waves

which

are

used

to

broadcast

TV

and

radio,and

of

course

wifi.2200202/101//2141/24Apart

from

science,

a

number

of

political

activists

have

also

made

significantcontributions

to

their

societies,

and

have

helped

to

win

freedom

for

theirpeople.

Perhaps

the

most

famous

of

these

was

Mahatma

Gandhi,

an

nlawyer

who

helped

to

win

independence

for

his

nation

from

the

British

withhis

unique

style

of

peaceful ,

which

was

later

an

inspiration

to

otherleaders

in

the

20th

century.

For

example,

in

the

US,

a

black

civil

rights

leadercalled

Martin

Luther

King

acknowledged

the

influence

of

Gandhi.

King’spassionate

style

and

non-violent s

against

segregation

helped

to

bringabout

political

change

for

black

people

in

that

country.In

conclusion,

the

scientists,inventors,

and

activists

mentioned

above

showclearly

that

individuals

can

contribute

greatly

to

their

societies,

so

it

is

nottrue

that

they

cannot

change

society.?.2200202/101//2141/24思考這個問題在歷史上， 者帶來了很多的

和

。有人認為如果女性來承擔

角色的話，她們能創造一個更和平的世界。你是否贊同此觀點？?.2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/24占到80%以上的一分為二邏輯一分為二的邏輯被嚴重依賴，這是因為兩個原因。首先，這種寫法能充分保障字數；其次，這種構思能體現你對所給觀點的精準看法。2200202/101//2141/24覆蓋更全面的一分為二邏輯1.

改寫陳述題目觀點。I

believe

that

一句話寫出你的清晰觀點(前面所提到的兩種一分為二方法)2.

It

is

true

that…/I

accept

that…/I

admit

that…(這里有n種方法來寫topicsentence)

………………3.

However/Nevertheless,開始對另一部分或者另一種情況進行分析。4.

In

conclusion,重復自己的觀點和看法。and并列A和B的一分為二Task2：Many

people

believe

that

socialnetworking

sites

(such

as )

have

hada

huge

negative

impact

on

both

individualsand

society.

To

what

extent

do

you

agree?2200202/101//2141/24Social

networking

sites,

for

instance ,

are

thought

by

sometohave

had

a

detrimental

effect

on

individual

people

as

well

as

society

andlocal

communities.

However,

in

my

opinion,

while

I

believe

that

such

sitesare

mainly

beneficial

to

the

individual,

I

agree

that

they

have

had

adamaging

effect

on

local

communities.?With

regards

to

individuals,

the

impact

that

online

socialmedia

has

hadon

eachindividual has

clear

advantages. ly,

people

fromdifferent

countries

are

brought

together

through

such

sites

aswhereas

before

the

development

of

technology

and

social

networkingsites,

people

rarely

had

the

chance

to

meet

or

communicate

with

anyoneoutside

of

their

immediate

circle

or

community.

Secondly,

alsohas

socialgroups

which

offer

individuals

a

chance

to

meet

and

participatein

discussions

with

people

who

share

common

interests.?22002200//1111//2244On

the

other

hand,

the

effect

that and

other

socialnetworkingsites

have

had

on

societies

and

local

communities

can

only

be

seen

asnegative.

Rather

than

individual

people

taking

part

in

their

localcommunity,

they

are

instead

choosing

to

take

more

interestin

peopleonline.

Consequently,

the

people

within

local

communitiesare

no

longerforming

close

or

supportive

relationships.

Furthermore,

society

as

a

wholeis ing

increasingly

disjointed

and

fragmented

as

people

spend

moretime

online

with

people

they

have

never

met

face

to

face

and

who

theyare

unlikely

to

ever

meet

in

the

future.To

conclude,

although

social

networking

sites

have

brought

individualscloser

together,

they

have

not

had

the

same

effect

on

society

or

localcommunities.

Local

communities

should

do

more

to

try

and

involve

localpeople

in

local

activities

in

order

to

promote

the

future

of

community

life.?22002200//1111//2244“取決于”的一分為二Task2：

Too

mu oney

is

spent

looking

after

andrepairing

old

buildings.

We

should

knock

them

downand

build

modern

ones

instead.

Do

you

agree

ordisagree?2200202/101//2141/24“取決于”的一分為二Most ernments

are

faced

with

the

dilemma

of

whether

to

spend

ahuge

amount

of

money

protecting

old

buildings

or

simply

knock

themdown.

In

my

opinion,

whether

an

old

building

should

be

torn

down

andmake

way

for

a

new

one

mainly

depends

on

its

value

in

terms

of

art

andhistory.?On

the

one

hand,

it

is

not

wise

for

the ernment

to

invest

financial

andother

resources

in

protecting

some

valueless

old

buildings

in

spite

of

theircenturial

existence.

If

a

house

or

tower

closely

resembles

hundreds

ofother

buildings

in

terms

of

design

and

function,

then

it

would

be

a

wasteof

money

to

keep

it

alive.

The ernment

instead

should

consider

makingspace

for

modern

buildings,

especially

those

high-rise

ones,

which

will

befollowed

by

a

range

of

benefits,

such

as

increasing

affordable

housingsupply

and

improving

living

conditions.2200202/101//2141/24“取決于”的一分為二On

the

other

hand,

it

is

undoubtedly

worthwhile

to

preserve

buildingswith

historic

and

artistic

meanings

even

at

a

significant

cost.

Thereason

is

that

these

buildings

attract

people

from

domestic

cities

and

allover

the

world.

Whether

the

feeling

is

patriotic

or

exotic,

visitors

to

thesemeaningful

sites

can

be

spiritually

satisfied

and

at

the

same

timemakeeconomic

contributions

to

the

city.

In

addition,

today's

designers

may

beable

to

learn

from

some

creativelydesigned

and

well

erected

buildings.For

example,

a

century-old

mansion

may

be

a

textbook

teaching

moderndevelopers

how

to

construct

houses

that

could

withstand

the

fiercest

ofhurricane.?In

conclusion,

I

do

not

agreethat

all

old

buildings

should

be

demolishedwithout

taking

their

unique

meanings

into

consideration.

Culturally

andhistorically

valuable

old

architectural

works

are

worth

preserving

andprotecting.2200202/101//2141/242200202/101//2141/24介紹段的可能性1.

改寫原題觀點

+自己的觀點---最常用2.

事實背景+改寫原題觀點

+自己的觀點---容易重復詞匯3.

事實背景+自己的觀點---難度最大是否贊同的介紹段Increasing

the

price

of

petrol

is

the

best

way

to

solve

growing

traffic

andpollution

problems.

To

what

extent

do

you

agree

or

disagree

with

thisopinion?版本一：It

is

sometimes

argued

that

the

increase

in

the

price

of

fuels

canbe

the

best

solution

to

problems

related

to

traffic

and

environment.

Icomple y

disagree

with

this

opinion.版本二：It

is

sometimes

argued

that

the

increase

in

the

price

of

fuels

canbe

the

best

solution

to

problems

related

to

traffic

and

environment.Although

I

believe

that

higher

fuel

prices

can

reduce

the

number

of

carson

the

street,

I

do

not

agreethat

a

simplerisein

the

price

is

enough.2200202/101//2141/24是否贊同的介紹段Some

people

think

that

instead

of