




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
2022年重慶大學英語考試真題卷
(本卷共分為1大題50小題,作答時間為180分鐘,總分100分,60分及格。)
單位:姓名:考號:
題號單選題多項選擇判斷題綜合題總分
分值
得分
一、單項選擇題(共50題,每題2分。每題的備選項中,只有一個最符合題意)
1.{{B}}PassageTwo{{/B}}
Aftertheyear1958,amoremodernSupremeCourtagreedwithJustice
Helen.Inahistoricdecisionin1954itheldthatIawsthatforeingblack
studentstogotoraciallysegregatedschooIsviolatedtheUS
ConstitutionbecausesuchschoolscouldneverbeequaI.Theopinionof
theCourtwasthat"toseparate(bIackschooIchiIdren)from
other-solelybecauseoftheirracegeneratesafeelingofinferiority-
thatmayaffecttheirheartsandmindsinawayuniikelyevertobeundone".
TheSupremeCourt*sdecisionin1954ledtochangeswhichbrought
anendtothesystemofsegregatedpubIiceducationinthesouthernstates.
However,problemsinracerelationscontinuedtotroublethepubIic
schools,eventhoughschoolswerelegallydesegregatedthroughoutthe
country.
BlackAmericanswerestillmainlyintheIowestincomeand
occupationaIgroupsandfrequentlyIivedinsIumsinthenation,slargest
cities.ThepubIicschoolsintheseareaswerecomposedpredominantly
orentirelyofblackstudentsandoftensharedtheneighborhoodproblems
ofhighcrimeratesandotherformsofsociaIdisorder.TheschooIsin
thebIacksIumswereclearIyunequaItothoseinthepredominantIywhite.
middleclassneighborhoods.
TheprobIemofschooIswhereraciaIseparationresuItsfromthemakeup
ofneighborhoodsratherthanfromlawsrequiringsegregationexistsin
alIpartsoftheUnitedStates,notjustintheSouth.Numerousefforts
tosolvethisprobIemhavenotsucceededverywell.ThemostcontroversiaI
methodusedtodealwithunequalneighborhoodschoolswasthebusingof
schooIchiIdrenfromtheirhomeneighborhoodstoschooIsinmoredistant
neighborhoodsinordertoachieveagreatermixtureofblackandwhite
chiIdreninalIschools.
BlackchiIdrenfrompoororslumneighborhoodswerebusedtoschooI
inpredominantlywhitemiddleclassneighborhoods,andstudentsIiving
inthemiddle-classneighborhoodswerebusedintothepoorerblack
neighborhoodschools.AnewquestiondealingwithracialequaIityin
educationwasbroughttotheSupremeCourtinthelate1970s.Thequestion
deaItwiththeadmissionpoliciesofprofessionaIschooIssuchasmedicaI
andlawschools,whichareattachedtomanyofthenation'scolleges
anduniversities.SomeoftheseschooIshaveattemptedtodomorethan
treatalIappIicantsequaIly.Manyhavetriedinrecentyearstomake
upforpastdiscriminationagainstbIacksandotherminoritiesbysetting
asideacertainnumberofpIacesspecificallyforappIicantsfromthese
groups,thispracticecametobedescribedassettingminorityquotas,
loweringsomewhattheacademicstandardsforadmissionforaIimited
numberofminorityappIicants.
FromParagraph1,wecaninferthatJusticeHelenadvocated.
A.blackstudentstogotoraciallysegregatedschools
B.thatitwasunlawfultoforceNegrochildrentoattendracially
segregatedschools
C.thatblackstudentsshouldn'tattendschoolswithwhiteclassmates
D.thattheschoolsblackchildrenattendedwereoflittledifference
2.
{{B}{PassageTwo
Questions29to31arebasedontheconversationyouhavejustheard.H/B}}
A.HecanstaywithhisrelativesintheUS.
B.Hecanplayhide-and-seekwithAmericanboys.
C.Hemusthaveatemporaryhomeandgotoschool.
D.HeshouldbesentbacktoCuba.
3.
{{B}}PassageThree
Questions32to35arebasedontheconversationyouhavejustheard.{{/B}}
A.ItisdifficultforpeoplelivinginaStoneAgeculturetomoveinto
amodernworld.
B.Inventionisanewideatomodernpeople.
C.Theabilitytobringtrainedpeopletogethertosolveproblemshows
manisbright.
D.Whatweneedisdemandsfromotherstoworkforabetterfuture.
4.
{{B}}H0WSATsWork{{/B}}
TestsareafactofIifethroughoutourschooIcareers,butoneof
themostimportant,and,tosomethescariest,ofthemalIistheSAT
-thatthree-hourexamthat*ssupposedtomeasureahighschooIstudent1
schanceofacademicsuccessinthefirstyearofcollege.Somecolleges
considerSATscoresmajorfactorsintheiradmissionprocess,while
othersviewhighschooIacademicperformance,alongwithrecommendations
ThenewerSAT11:SubjectTests,formerlytheCo11egeBoard
AchievementTests,areintendedtomeasureastudent1sknowledgeofa
particularsubject,suchasEnglish(writingorIiterature),historyand
sociaIsciences,mathematics(variouslevels),sciences,andIanguages
(Chinese,French,German,modernHebrew,Italian,Japanese,Latin,
Spanish,English).SomecollegesrequireoneormoreSATIItests,but
eveniftheyaren*trequired,SAT11testsscorescanhelpyoupresent
amorepersonalizedportfoliothatiIlustrateshowwe11youwouldfit
ataparticularschool.MostcollegesuseSAT11scoresnotforadmission
purposesbutforprogrampIacementandcounseling.SAT11testsaregiven
onasiightIydifferentschedulefromtheSATI.Generally,SATIItests
areonehourlongandconsistofmultiplechoicequestions.Thereare
exceptions.Forexample,theWritingTesthas40minutesof
mu11ipIe-choicequestionsanda20-minutewritingsample.
Todecidewhichsubjecttestshouldbetaken,first,makealistof
alIthecollegesyou'reconsidering.Thenreviewtheircatalogsor
websitestofindoutiftheyrequireSubjectTestscoresforadmission
and,ifso,whichones.UseyourIistofcolIegesandth?iradmission
requirementstohelpplanyourhighschoolcourseschedule.Forexample,
aco11egetowhichyouplantoapplymayrequireaIanguageSubjectTest
scoreormightexemptyoufromafirst-yearcourserequirementifyou
dowellonaIanguageSubjectTest.
Inaddition,theCo11egeBoardwebsitecanbesearchedforinformation
aboutSubjectTestrequirementsatspecificcolleges.
{{B}}WhenIstheSATTaken{{/B}}
Generally,thelatestyoucantakeyourSATsandbeeligiblefor
admissioninthenextacademicyearisinthefaIIofyoursenioryear
ofhighschooI.You,11wanttocheckappIicationdeadIinesatschools
inwhichyou'reinterestedtobesureyourscoreswi11makeitinon
time.(YoucanalsotakeadvantageoftheCo11egeBoard1snew
phone-for-resuItsservice.You*11bechargedafeebutyou,11getyour
scoresabout10daysearIier.)Increasingly,studentsaretakingtheSAT
inthesummerbeforetheirsenioryears,inthe11thgradeandevenas
earlyasthe10thgrade.
It,sveryimportanttoregisterearlyfortheSATtoavoidthedeadIine
rush,sincetestingsitescanfiIIupquicklyandforceyoutogotoone
fartheraway.(DeadIinesareusuaIlyaboutamonthorsixweeksbefore
theactuaItest).Youcanregisteronlinenowbutonceyou've
A.Becausetherewillbefewertestingsitesnearthedeadline.
B.Becausetheywillnothaveenoughtimetoprepareiftheyregistertoo
1atp.
C.Becausetherewi11usuallybetoomanypeopletakingthetestnearthe
deadline.
D.Becausetheycanonlyregisteronlineiftheydoittoolate.
5.
({B}}Questions11to18arebasedontheconversationyouhavejust
heard.{{/B}}
A.JoeboughtFred'scar.
B.Themanisjoking.
C.Fred'scarisnobgood.
D.ThemanwantsJack,scar.
6.{{B}}PassageTwo{{/B}}
Aftertheyear1958,amoremodernSupremeCourtagreedwithJustice
Helen.Inahistoricdecisionin1954itheldthatIawsthatforcingblack
studentstogotoraciallysegregatedschoolsviolatedtheUS
ConstitutionbecausesuchschoolscouldneverbeequaI.Theopinionof
theCourtwasthat"toseparate(bIackschooIchiIdren)from
other-solelybecauseoftheirracegeneratesafeeIingofinferiority-
thatmayaffecttheirheartsandmindsinawayunlikelyevertobeundone".
TheSupremeCourt*sdecisionin1954ledtochangeswhichbrought
anendtothesystemofsegregatedpubIiceducationinthesouthernstates.
However,problemsinracerelationscontinuedtotroublethepubIic
schools,eventhoughschoolswereIega11ydesegregatedthroughoutthe
country.
BlackAmericanswerestillmainlyinthelowestincomeand
occupationaIgroupsandfrequentlyIivedinsIumsinthenation,slargest
cities.ThepubIicschooIsintheseareaswerecomposedpredominantly
orentirelyofblackstudentsandoftensharedtheneighborhoodproblems
ofhighcrimeratesandotherformsofsociaIdisorder.TheschooIsin
theblacksIumswereclearlyunequaItothoseinthepredominantlywhite,
middleclassneighborhoods.
TheprobIemofschooIswhereraciaIseparationresuItsfromthemakeup
ofneighborhoodsratherthanfromlawsrequiringsegregationexistsin
alIpartsoftheUnitedStates,notjustintheSouth.Numerousefforts
tosolvethisprobIemhavenotsucceededverywell.ThemostcontroversiaI
methodusedtodealwithunequalneighborhoodschoolswasthebusingof
schooIchiIdrenfromtheirhomeneighborhoodstoschooIsinmoredistant
neighborhoodsinordertoachieveagreatermixtureofblackandwhite
chiIdreninalIschools.
BlackchiIdrenfrompoororslumneighborhoodswerebusedtoschooI
inpredominantlywhitemiddleclassneighborhoods,andstudentsIiving
inthemiddle-classneighborhoodswerebusedintothepoorerblack
neighborhoodschools.AnewquestiondeaIingwithracialequaIityin
educationwasbroughttotheSupremeCourtinthelate1970s.Thequestion
deaItwiththeadmissionpoliciesofprofessionaIschooIssuchasmedicaI
andlawschools,whichareattachedtomanyofthenation1scolleges
anduniversities.SomeoftheseschooIshaveattemptedtodomorethan
treatalIapplicantsequally.Manyhavetriedinrecentyearstomake
upforpastdiscriminationagainstbIacksandotherminoritiesbysetting
asideacertainnumberofpIacesspecificallyforapplicantsfromthese
groups,thispracticecametobedescribedassettingminorityquotas,
loweringsomewhattheacademicstandardsforadmissionforaIimited
numberofminorityapplicants.
In1954,theraciallysegregatedschooIwasgraduallyoutofexistence
A.Southernstates
B.America
C.NewYork
D.NorthernStates
7.
{{B}}PassageOne{{/B}}
Thereisaphenomenainthepresent.Theaveragenumberofauthors
onscientificpapersisskyrocketing.Whatisthemainreasonforit
That,spartlybecauselabsarcbigger,problemsaremorecompIicated,
andmoredifferentsubspecialtiesareneeded.Butit'salsobecauseUS
governmentagenciesIiketheNationaIInstitutesofHealth(NIH)have
startedtopromote"teamsciencen.AsphysicsdeveIopedinthepost-WorId
War11era,federalfundsbuiltexpensivenationalfaciIities,andthese
servedassurfacesonwhichcollaborationscouldcrystalIizenaturally.
Yetmultipleauthorship-howevergooditmaybeinotherways-
presentsforjournalsandfortheinstitutionsinwhichtheseauthors
work.Forthejournals,longIistsofauthorsarehardtodeaIwithin
themselves.ButthoselongIistsgiverisetomoreseriousquestions
whensomethinggoeswrongwiththepaper.Ifthereisresearchmisconduct,
shouldtheliabilitybejointandseveral,accruingtoalIauthorsIf
not,thenhowshoulditbeaIlocatedamongthemIfthereisanhonest
mistakeinonepartoftheworkbutnotinothers,howshouldanevaluator
aimhisorherreview
Variouspracticalorimpracticalsuggestionshaveemergedduringthe
Iong-standingdebateonthisissue.OneisthateachauthorshouIdprovide,
andthejournalshouldthenpubIish,anaccountofthatauthor*s
particularcontributiontothework.Butadifferentviewoftheproblem,
andperhapsofthesolution,comesaswegettouniversitycommitteeon
appointmentsandpromotions,whichiswheretheauthorshiprubberreally
meetstheroad.HalfaIifetimeofinvoIvementwiththisprocesshas
taughtmehowmuchauthorshipmattars.Ihavewatchedcommittees
attemptingtodecodesequencesofnames,agonizeoverwhetheramuchcited
paperwasreallythecandidate1sworkoracoauthor*s,andsendback
recommendationsaskingformorespecificityaboutthedivisionof
responsibiIity.
Problemsofthiskindchangetheargument,supportingthecasefor
askingauthorstodefinetheirownroIes.AfteralLifquaIityjudgments
aboutindividuaIsaretobemadeonthebasisoftheirpersonal
contributions,thenthejudgesbetterknowwhattheydid.Butifquestions
ariseaboutthevalidityoftheworkasawhole,whetheraschaIIenges
toitsconductorasevaluationsofitsinfluenceinthefield,ateam
isateam,andthemembersshouldsharethecreditortheblame.
Accordingtothepassage,authorshipisimportantwhen.
A.practicalorimpracticalsuggestionsoftheauthorsarcconsidered
B.appointmentsandpromotionsoftheauthorsareinvolved
C.evaluatorsneedtoreviewthepublicationoftheauthors
D.thepublicationoftheauthorshasbeconcmuch-cited
8.
{{B}}H0WSATsWork{(/B)}
TestsareafactofIifethroughoutourschooIcareers,butoneof
themostimportant,and,tosomethescariest,ofthemalIistheSAT
-thatthree-hourexamthat1ssupposedtomeasureahighschooIstudent,
schanceofacademicsuccessinthefirstyearofcollege.Someco11eges
considerSATscoresmajorfactorsintheiradmissionprocess,while
othersviewhighschooIacademicperformance,alongwithrecommendations
andextracurricularactivities,equaIly,orevenmoreimportantIy.No
matterwhereyou1reheaded,ifyou*reahighschoolstudent,theSAT
isimportanttoyoubecausemostcoIIegesrequirestudentstoreport
eitherSATorACTAssessment(anothertest)scores.
{{B}}WhatIstheSAT{{/B}}
Firstofall,SATnolongerstandsforScholasticAptitudeTest(學
術性傾向測驗),theoriginalnameofthetestwhenitwasintroducedin
1941.AIthoughyoumaystillseethatnameoccasionaIIy,theCoIlegeBoard,
thenot-for-profiteducationaIassociationthatsponsorstheSATs,
decidedtolettheacronymstandonitsownasawayofaddressing
controversyaboutthemeaningoftheword''aptitude".TheCo11egeBoard
alsorejectedthealternative"ScholasticAssessmentTest".(English
teachersprobabIypointedoutthatthisnamewasredundant,since
assessmentmeanstest.)
TheSATImeasuresverbalandmathreasoningabilitiesthatyou'
vedeveIopedthroughoutyourschooIyears.Themultiple-choicetest,
deveIopedbythenot-for-profitEducationaITestingService,isintended
toletstudentsdemonstratetheirverbalandmathabiIitieswithout
regardtothekindofschooIingthey*vehad.AccordingtotheCo11ege
Board,thetestlooksforastudent,sabiIitytounderstandandanalyze
writtenmaterial,todrawinferences,todifferentiateshadesofmeaning,
todrawconclusionsandsolvemathproblemsalIskillsthatarenecessary
forsuccessincollegeandtheworkworld.
TheAmericanCollegeTesting(ACT).Assessment,whichwasintroduced
in1959,isanalternativetotheSATthatvirtuallyalIcollegesand
universitiesnowaccept.Developersofthetesttoutitforits
curricuIum-basedquestions,sayingthattheirtestismoredirectly
reIatedtowhatisactuallytaughtinhighschooI.
{{B}}What*stheSAT11{{/B}}
ThenewerSATII:SubjectTests,formerlytheCollegeBoard
AchievementTests,areintendedtomeasureastudent'sknowledgeofa
particularsubject,suchasEnglish(writingorIiterature),historyand
sociaIsciences,mathematics(variouslevels),sciences,andlanguages
(Chinese,French,German,modernHebrew,Italian,Japanese,Latin,
Spanish,English).SomecollegesrequireoneormoreSAT11tests,but
eveniftheyaren,trequired,SATIItestsscorescanheIpyoupresent
amorepersonalizedportfoliothatiIlustrateshowweIIyouwouldfit
ataparticularschooI.MostcoIIegesuseSAT11scoresnotforadmission
purposesbutforprogrampIacementandcounseling.SAT11testsaregiven
onasIightIydifferentschedulefromtheSATI.Generally,SAT11tests
areonehourlongandconsistofmultiplechoicequestions.Thereare
exceptions.Forexample,theWritingTesthas40minutesof
mu11ipIe-choicequestionsanda20-minutewritingsample.
Todecidewhichsubjecttestshouldbetaken,first,makealistof
alIthecollegesyou'reconsidering.Thenreviewtheircatalogsor
websitestofindoutiftheyrequireSubjectTestscoresforadmission
and,ifso,whichones.UseyourIistofcollegesandtheiradmission
requirementstohelpplanyourhighschoolcourseschedule.ForexampIe,
aco11egetowhichyouplantoapplymayrequireaIanguageSubjectTest
scoreormightexemptyoufromafirst-yearcourserequirementifyou
dowellonaIanguageSubjectTest.
Inaddition,theCo11egeBoardwebsitecanbesearchedforinformation
aboutSubjectTestrequirementsatspecificcolleges.
{{B}}WhenIstheSATTaken{{/B}}
GeneraIly,thelatestyoucantakeyourSATsandbeeligiblefor
admissioninthenextacademicyearisinthefa11ofyoursenioryear
ofhighschooI.You,11wanttocheckappIicationdeadIinesatschooIs
inwhichyou*reinterestedtobesureyourscoreswiIImakeitinon
time.(YoucanaIsotakeadvantageoftheCoIIegeBoard1snew
phone-for-resuItsservice.You'11bechargedafeebutyou'11getyour
scoresabout10daysearIier.)Increasingly,studentsaretakingtheSAT
inthesummerbeforetheirsenioryears,inthe11thgradeandevenas
earlyasthe10thgrade.
It'sveryimportanttoregisterearlyfortheSATtoavoidthedeadIine
rush,sineetestingsitescanfiIIupquicklyandforceyoutogotoone
fartheraway.(DeadIinesareusuallyaboutamonthorsixweeksbefore
theactuaItest).Youcanregisteronlinenowbutonceyou've
A.Afterseveralyearsofstudy.
B.Immediatelywhenyoufinishthecourse,
C.Whenyouhavealargeinformationsource.
D.Rightafteraholidaywhenyourmindisrefreshed.
9.
{{B}}PassageOne{{/B}}
Thereisaphenomenainthepresent.Theaveragenumberofauthors
onscientificpapersisskyrocketing.Whatisthemainreasonforit
That'spartlybecauselabsarcbigger,problemsaremorecompIicated,
andmoredifferentsubspecialtiesareneeded.Butit,salsobecauseUS
governmentagenciesIiketheNationaIInstitutesofHealth(NIH)have
startedtopromote"teamscience".Asphysicsdevelopedinthepost-WorId
War11era,federalfundsbuiltexpensivenationalfaciIities,andthese
servedassurfacesonwhichcollaborationscouldcrystalIizenaturally.
Yetmultipleauthorship-howevergooditmaybeinotherways-
presentsforjournalsandfortheinstitutionsinwhichtheseauthors
work.Forthejournals,longIistsofauthorsarehardtodeaIwithin
themselves.ButthoselongIistsgiverisetomoreseriousquestions
whensomethinggoeswrongwiththepaper.Ifthereisresearchmisconduct,
shouIdtheliabilitybejointandseveraI,accruingtoaIIauthorsIf
not,thenhowshoulditbeaIlocatedamongthemIfthereisanhonest
mistakeinonepartoftheworkbutnotinothers,howshouldanevaluator
aimhisorherreview
Variouspracticalorimpracticalsuggestionshaveemergedduringthe
Iong-standingdebateonthisissue.OneisthateachauthorshouIdprovide,
andtheJournalshouldthenpubIish,anaccountofthatauthor1s
particularcontributiontothework.Butadifferentviewoftheproblem,
andperhapsofthesolution,comesaswegettouniversitycommitteeon
appointmentsandpromotions,whichiswheretheauthorshiprubberreally
meetstheroad.HalfaIifetimeofinvoIvementwiththisprocesshas
taughtmehowmuchauthorshipmattars.Ihavewatchedcommittees
attemptingtodecodesequencesofnames,agonizeoverwhetheramuchcited
paperwasreallythecandidate*sworkoracoauthor,s,andsendback
recommendationsaskingformorespecificityaboutthedivisionof
responsibiIity.
Problemsofthiskindchangetheargument,supportingthecasefor
askingauthorstodefinetheirownroIes.Aftera111ifquaIityjudgments
aboutindividuaIsaretobemadeonthebasisoftheirpersonal
contributions,thenthejudgesbetterknowwhattheydid.Butifquestions
ariseaboutthevalidityoftheworkasawhole,whetheraschaIlenges
toitsconductorasevaluationsofitsinfluenceinthefield,ateam
isateam,andthemembersshouldsharethecreditortheblame.
Whethermultipleauthorsofapapershouldbetakencollectivelyor
individuallydependson
A.whetherjudgmentsaremadeaboutthepaperoritsauthors
B.whetheritisthecreditortheblamethattheauthorsneedtoshare
C.howmanyauthorsareinvolvedinthepaper
D.wherethepaperhasbeenpublished
10.{{B})PassageTwo{{/B}}
Aftertheyear1958,amoremodernSupremeCourtagreedwithJustice
Helen.Inahistoricdecisionin1954itheldthatlawsthatforeingblack
studentstogotoraciallysegregatedschoolsviolatedtheUS
ConstitutionbecausesuchschoolscouldneverbeequaI.Theopinionof
theCourtwasthat"toseparate(bIackschooIchiIdren)from
other-solelybecauseoftheirracegeneratesafeeIingofinferiority-
thatmayaffecttheirheartsandmindsinawayuniikelyevertobeundone".
TheSupremeCourt,sdecisionin1954ledtochangeswhichbrought
anendtothesystemofsegregatedpubIiceducationinthesouthernstates.
However,problemsinracerelationscontinuedtotroublethepubIic
schools,eventhoughschoolswereIegaIIydesegregatedthroughoutthe
country.
BlackAmericanswerestillmainlyinthelowestincomeand
occupationaIgroupsandfrequentlyIivedinsIumsinthenation,slargest
cities.ThepubIicschooIsintheseareaswerecomposedpredominantly
orentirelyofblackstudentsandoftensharedtheneighborhoodproblems
ofhighcrimeratesandotherformsofsociaIdisorder.Theschoolsin
thebIacksIumswereclearlyunequaItothoseinthepredominantlywhite,
middleclassneighborhoods.
TheprobIemofschooIswhereraciaIseparationresuItsfromthemakeup
ofneighborhoodsratherthanfromlawsrequiringsegregationexistsin
alIpartsoftheUnitedStates,notjustintheSouth.Numerousefforts
tosolvethisprobIemhavenotsucceededverywell.ThemostcontroversiaI
methodusedtodealwithunequalneighborhoodschoolswasthebusingof
schooIchiIdrenfromtheirhomeneighborhoodstoschooIsinmoredistant
neighborhoodsinordertoachieveagreatermixtureofblackandwhite
chiIdreninalIschools.
BlackchiIdrenfrompoororsIumneighborhoodswerebusedtoschooI
inpredominantlywhitemiddleclassneighborhoods,andstudentsIiving
inthemiddle-classneighborhoodswerebusedintothepoorerblack
neighborhoodschooIs.AnewquestiondeaIingwithracialequaIityin
educationwasbroughttotheSupremeCourtinthelate1970s.Thequestion
deaItwiththeadmissionpoliciesofprofessionaIschooIssuchasmedicaI
andlawschools,whichareattachedtomanyofthenation*scolleges
anduniversities.SomeoftheseschooIshaveattemptedtodomorethan
treatalIapplicantsequally.Manyhavetriedinrecentyearstomake
upforpastdiscriminationagainstbIacksandotherminoritiesbysetting
asideacertainnumberofplacesspecificallyforapplicantsfromthese
groups,thispracticecametobedescribedassettingminorityquotas,
loweringsomewhattheacademicstandardsforadmissionforaIimited
numberofminorityapplic
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025按摩師勞動合同范本
- 2025標準化的租賃合同模板參考
- 鋁木門常用課件
- 2025網約車轉讓合同
- 公路養護勞務合同范本
- 防冰凍防滑知識
- 家電套購協議合同范本
- 建筑輔料 配送合同范本
- 蛋糕批發轉讓合同范本
- 個人租房借款合同范本
- 2024年國家發改委直屬單位招聘考試真題
- 2025年無錫工藝職業技術學院單招職業技能測試題庫附答案
- 2025年長春職業技術學院單招職業技能考試題庫帶答案
- 2025年河南農業職業學院單招職業傾向性測試題庫必考題
- 蔚來銷售培訓
- 艾滋病、梅毒母嬰阻斷干預技術課件
- 中國常規肺功能檢查基層指南解讀(2024年)解讀課件
- 《IFC工業基礎類》課件
- 2024年江蘇省腫瘤醫院高層次衛技人才招聘筆試歷年參考題庫頻考點附帶答案
- 2025年山東濱州北海經濟開發區招聘20人歷年高頻重點提升(共500題)附帶答案詳解
- 《畢業生就業協議書》(空白)原件
評論
0/150
提交評論