




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
TheCrime/TortPuzzleWehavetwolegalsystemstodoessentiallythesamejobYoudosomethingbad,thelegalsystemintervenes,somethingbadhappenstoyouAreasonnottodobadthingsOne,tort,treatsoffensesasoffensesagainstthevictimOne,criminal,treatsoffensesasoffensesagainstthestateThisraisesthreequestionsIsthereagoodreasontohaveboth?Wouldwebebetteroffwithonlyone?Isthereagoodreasontosortoffensesaswedo?Isthereagoodreasontobundlelegalrulesaswedo?ShouldWeAbolishtheCriminalLaw?ImagineapuretortsystemProblemsThevictimmaynothavetheresourcestoprosecute.SomeoffensescausediffuseinjuryOffendersmaybejudgementproofOnecouldhavelegalrulesmakingthatlesslikelyThestatecouldpaythefineandimprisontheoffender—stillmostlytortPotentialvictimscouldcommitinadvancetobuydeterrence,asin18thc.EnglandThefineforacrimeisboththepunishmentforthecriminalandtherewardforthevictimWewanttheoptimalprobability/punishmentpairButsettingthepunishmentsetstheprobability,sinceitdeterminesthepayofftocatchinghimWecannotseparatelycontroltwofunctionswithonevariableThefancysolution,usingprofitmaximizationforanadditionalconstraint,isanarticleonmywebpageThesimpleansweristhattheidenticalproblemexistsforordinarytortlawSortingOffensesDoweallocateoffensescorrectlytothetwosystem?TortlawforoffenseswhereweknowwhodiditLandes/PosnerargumentThateliminatestheprobability/punishmentproblemforcatchingtheoffenderButthechanceofwinningatortsuitdependsonhowmuchyouarewillingtospendJudgementproofargumentIfitishardtocatchtheoffender,weneedabigfinetoprovideadequatedeterrenceWhichtheoffendermaynotbeabletopayAndcatchinghimisexpensive,sowealsoneedabigfinetomakeitworthdoingOntheotherhand,tortsaremorelikelythancrimestobeanonymousvictimAndthetortsweseelitigatedaretheoneseasytodetectBundlingLegalRulesThesamepersoncontrolsprosecutionandcollectsfinesThatmakessense,sinceotherwisethecontrollertakesabribetodropthecaseButitcreatesanopportunityforfraudulentprosecutionMoreefficientpunishmentsgowithalowerstandardofproofMakessense,sinceerrorshavelowersocialcost,but…AnefficientpunishmentisanincentiveforfraudulentprosecutionWhichiseasierwithalowerstandardofproofBurglary,TrafficAccidents,andIncentivesTreatingsomethingasatortreducesthevictim’sincentivetoavoiditSowheretheactcreatesanetcost,makeitacrimeinsteadForinstancetrafficaccidentsWheresomethingisatransferIfthevictimisfullycompensated,noneedforanincentiveforhimtopreventitItwillonlyhappenwhenthegaintotheoffenderisgreaterthanthecostSoburglaryshouldbeatortThepointbeingthatweareoptimizingonmanymarginsAndpickingoneletsyouargueforaconclusion,ignoringtheothersWhichmeansthatwhatevertherule,youmaybeableto“prove”itisefficientIstheCommonLawEfficient?Theaprioricase—shouldweexpectittobe?ArgumentforjudgesdoingitdeliberatelyIncreasingthesizeofthepieistheonegoodthingjudgescando,sotheytrytodoitButthatassumestheyknowenougheconomicsAnditassumestheyarenotaimingatjusticeinsteadPerhapstheyare,andthereissomereasonwhywhatisefficientisseenasjust?InvisiblehandargumentIfthelawisinefficient,partieshaveanincentivetotrytoworkarounditOrtolitigateinthehopeofchangingitEventuallythelawchangesButchangingthelawfacesapublicgoodproblemIfbeneficiariesofaninefficientlegalruleareaconcentratedinterestgroupAndlosersdispersedinterestgroupThebeneficiariesmayraisemoretolitigateforitthantheloserstolitigateagainstConsider,forinstance,anagencylitigatingforrulesitlikesagainstdispersedlosersTheCasefromtheEvidencePropertyrulesvsliabilityrulesThelegalsystemmostlygetsthatright,but…MostlydoingittheotherwayisnotjustinefficientbutobviouslyunworkableOthergeneralpatternsseemtofitthetheoryTherighttogrowcropsonlandisbundledwiththerighttowalkonitInolongerownmypropertyuptotheheavensTortlawasaPigouviantaxNegligenceasasolutiontothejointcausationproblemPosneroffersvariousdetailedrulesthathearguesfitStrictliabilityforultrahazardousactivitiesBecauseactivitylevel(keepingapetlion)isanimportantvariableThemostreliableprecautionisnottoEggshellskullruleBecausethepotentialtortfeasorfacesanaveragecostoftakingtheactionThatreflectsthelowprobability/highcostoutcomeThealternativeistopaynothingwhenthereisnoinjury,onlyanaveragewhenthereisTheCaseAgainstOrgansalesareillegal(Butprobablystatutorylaw).DittoadoptionmktNofreedomofcontractforproductliabilityGuaranteesaregenerallyenforceableButwaiversarenotOrbreach—penaltyclausesarenotenforceableAlthoughapenaltyclauseisjustavoluntarilyagreedtopropertyruleAndpropertyrulesarepartofcommonlawThecommonlawtreatsthevalueoflifeaszerointortiousdeathcasesSinceyourclaimdieswithyouSoaninefficientlylowincentivenottotakeriskswithotherpeople’slivesTortclaimsarenotmarketable.IftheywereThatwouldsolvetheproblemofnotbeingabletoaffordalawyerAndofnotknowingwhatlawyerwoulddoagoodjobAndprovideasuperiorsubstituteforclassactionsTheCaseforIgnoranceEconomicargumentsarecomplicatedMycrime/tortchapterrantheargumentthroughsevenroundsThisiswhyyoucouldhaveapuretortsystemThisiswhyitwouldn’tworkThisishowthatproblemwouldbedealtwithThis…Onceyouknowthelegalrule,youcanusuallyfindsomeargumentthatitisefficientComingtothenuisanceAgoodrule,becauseitischeapertomoveahousingdevelopmentorpigfarmbeforeitisbuiltAbadrule,becausemypigfarmgivesmecontroloverlandthatwilllaterbewantedforhousingSoIhavearentseekingargumenttobuildthepigfarmnowwhereyouwillwanttobuildhousinglaterTheHimalayanphotographerandtheEggshellSkullTheeconomiclogicoftwoproblemsisthesameThelegalanswerisdifferentAndeachtimePosnerconcludesthatthelegalansweriscorrectConclusion:ThejuryisstilloutThereissomeevidencethatthecommonlawtendstowardsefficientrulesButalsoevidenceagainstAndarguments,butnotcompellingones,forwhywemightexpectittoWhethertheConjectureisCorrectorNotConsiderwhatwehavedonesofar.Startwithonebehavioralassumption(rationality)Oneconjectureabouttheorganizingprinciple:EfficiencyEndwithAwayofseeingalllaw,assolutionstoacommonsetofproblemsAwayofapplyingthesamesetofideasacrosslegaltopics:Riskallocation--contractandtort.ExAnte/ExPostTortandcriminallawofhighwaysExplainingwhyattemptsarecriminalExternalities,incentives,doublecausationproblem,transactioncostsPollutionregulationDefiningpropertyrightsinlandCommonlawofnuisanceTortlaw--autoaccidents.Productliability.ContractdamagerulesAndiftheLawIsn’tEfficientPerhapsitshouldbeInsofaraslegalruleseithercannotredistributeOrarealessefficientwaythandirecttaxandtransfer(QuangNg’sargument)AndinsofaraswehavenoadequatetheoryofjusticeItmaymakesensetotrytodesignthelawtomaximizethesizeofthepieEvenifoneviewseconomicefficiencyasonlyonedesirablegoalItisworthknowingwhenachangeinlegalrulesincreasesordecreasesitSoasonlytodecreaseitwhenthereissomeotheradvantagethatoutweighsthatcostAndtoincreaseitwhendoingsodoesnothavecostsinothervaluesAndeconomicanalysis,asdevelopedinresponsetothePosnerConjectureTellsushowtodosoSowhetherornottheconjecturewastrue,itwasusefulAlternativeSolutionstotheProblemofLawFeudLaw:DecentralizedandprivatelyenforcedDictatorship:SomeonetellseveryonewhattodoandmakesthemdoitDecentralizeddecisionsunderstateenforcedlegalrulesOursystem,whichyouhavebeenstudyingAndmostofthisbookisaboutFeudLawLawbyprivateviolenceandthreatsofviolenceIfyouwrongmeIthreatentoharmyouunlessyoucompensatemeAformofdecentralizedprivatelawenforcementTowork,itneedstosolvefourproblemsMakemythreatmorebelievableifyoureallydidwrongme:somewaythatRightmakesmightInIceland,thecourtsystemAmongtheRomanichal,asmallcommunity,myfriendsonlysupportmeiftheythinkIamjustifiedGivemeanincentivetocarryoutmythreat,evenifdoingsoiscostlyThemanwhowrongedmemayfightback,evenkillme,ifItrytoharmhimInternalincentives,feelingsofvengefulness—ahardwiredcommitmentstrategyExternalincentives—statusandreputationThereissomewayinwhichpeoplewithfewresourcesgettheirrightsenforcedIntheIcelandiccase,transferabletortclaimsInSomalia,membershipinadiyapayinggroupThereisamechanismforterminatingfeudIfbothsidesbelievetheyareintheright,bothhaveanincentivenottogiveinArbitrationbysomeonetrustedandpowerfulisonecommonsolutiontothatproblemFeudlawisarguablywhatmostsystemswerebuiltoverAnglo-AmericancommonlawgrewoutofAnglo-SaxonlawWhichwasIcelandiclawplusakingWhoclaimedthatsomeoffenseswereagainsthimaswellasthevictimBecausetheyviolatedtheking’speaceIslamiclawcontainsJinayat,Acaseforkillingorinjuringisprivatelyprosecuted,privatelysettledBythevictimorhisheirsInJewishlaw,executionisby“theavengerofblood”Theheirofthevictim,whoinafeudsystemwouldhavepursuedfeudAndcan,undersomecircumstances,killakillernotsentencedtoexecutionwithoutpenaltyInearlyRomanlawTheftwastreatedasatort,thevictimplayedalargeroleinenforcementAntheLawoftheTwelveTablesseemstoassumesomeselfenforcementFeudLawStillExistsDeFactoConsiderIPpatentconflictsApplecouldsueSamsungonwhattheyknowisaweakcaseThecourtmightgetitwrong,givethemdamagesAndwhilethecaseisgoing,peoplewillbereluctanttobuySamsungphonesButSamsungcouldalsosueAppleonaweakcaseThethreatofretaliationisareasonnottosueunlessyouexpecttowinThinkofthecourtasthewayrightmakesmightinthatsystemThatdoesn’tworkforNPC’s,akapatenttrollsTheyarenotpracticingtheirpatents,socannotbecountersuedSohaveabelievablethreatevenwhentheircaseisweakBigcompanieshavecommitmentstrategies—payingoffonetrollencouragesothersSmallcompaniesarenotrepeatplayersConsideralotofillegalviolenceWekilledamemberofyourgangbecauseyoukilledoneofoursIshothimbecauseIfoundhiminbedwithmywifeAndmanylessextremeexamplesDictatorshipThedirectcentralizedsolutionProblemsThedictatordoesn’tknowenoughtofindthebestsolutionBecausetheinformationisdecentralized—youknowyourtastesandabilitiesAndbecauseitistoomuchinformationforanypersonorcomputertohandleThinkaboutallthelittlethingsyouknowaboutthingsrelevanttosolvingitIncludingeverythingyoudoEastGermanysupposedlyusedhalfthepopulationtospyonallthepopulationAndthatwouldhavereportedatinyfractionoftheinformationabouteachpersonAllofwhichheknowsandcanactonThedictatorhastomakeyoudothingsIcanmovemyarmbywillingitYoucanmovemyarmonlybymoreindirectandcostlymechanismsSoyourcontrollingmeismorecostlythanmecontrollingmeWhatincentivedoesthedictatorhavetoserveusinsteadofhimself?ThetheoryofthefirmislargelyabouttheseissuesonasmallerscaleOurSysteminBriefProperty,Contract,TortandCrimePrivatepropertyrequiresDefinitionofwhatitisthatisownedWayofknowingwhoownsitandhowownershipisacquiredMechanismsforenforcing,settlingdisputesGeneralizedfromrealpropertytomuchelseHencepropertylaw,includingIPImportantthatpropertycanbetransferredSometimesincomplicatedexchangesWeneedcontractsspecifyingtermsoftransferMechanismstosettledisputesovertheirimplicationsHencecontractlawRulescanbeviolated,soweneedMechanismstomakeitinpeople’sinterestnottoviolatetherulesWaysofsettlingdisputesoverwhethertheywereviolatedAndtheconsequencesthereofTortlaw,criminallaw,courtsandprocedureHowtoGetEfficientRulesStartwithprivatepropertyandtrade,butTheworlddoesn’tbreakupintowhollyseparatepiecesMyuseofmystuffeffectsyou:ExternalitiesSolutions?Directregulation--“dothat”Liabilityrule--payforcostsyouimposeButcostsarejointlycausedSoalternativelywecanTreatrightsasproperty,tobedefinedandthentransactedoverWorkswellwheretransactioncostsarelowButoftentheyarenotDonothing Putupwithsomeinefficiencies,becauseThecostofdealingwiththemismorethanitisworthOtherPiecesoftheAnswerNotjustthecontrolofexternalitiesbutDefiningwhatrightsOwnershipimpliesAndwhohasthemHowtoenforcerightsExpostorexanteLiabilityvspropertyrulesOptimalpunishmenttoenforcepropertyrulesToConstructEfficientLawChooseanappropriatecombinationofpropertyandliabilityrulesTakingaccountofthecostsofbothIntransactions,enforcementanderrorsDefineandbundlepropertyrightsinawaythatminimizescostsOfdefininganddefendingthemAndtransactingoverthem.EnforcethewholebySomemixofpublicandprivateactionUnderasuitablesetofrulesofproofandliability.ThroughouttheprojectconsidertheincentivesofallpartiesIncludingvictims,offenders,enforcers,judges,legislators,…AlsotransactioncostsAndtheproblemofusingdispersedandimperfectinformation.Wherepossible,createinstitutionsthatmakeitinsomeone’sinteresttousesuchinformationtogeneratetheappropriaterules.WhatWe(andeveryoneelse)LeftOutEveniftheanalysisisright,wedon'thavethedataActuallycalculatingoptimalpunishmentsWouldrequireinformationOnsupplycurvesofoffensesDamagedoneCostofpunishmentandenforcementCostoftransactionsWhichwedon'thaveConsiderrailroads,sparks,cloverandspaghettiSoweendupwithqualitativeconclusionsatbestWhatRemainsfortheNextGeneration(You?)toDoApplicationoftheapproachtoenforcementsideMyefficientpunishmentstuff—civilforfeitureandsimilarissuesEvidenceontheincentivesandbehaviorofelectedprosecutorsApplyingthethe
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 家具設(shè)計中用戶反饋的重要性與優(yōu)化迭代的關(guān)系研究試題及答案
- 圖形創(chuàng)意考試試題及答案
- 家具設(shè)計的個性需求與市場適應(yīng)性研究試題及答案
- 企業(yè)選拔考試題及答案
- 大學(xué)化學(xué)考試思維挑戰(zhàn)試題及答案
- 探討創(chuàng)業(yè)扶持政策的戰(zhàn)略性試題及答案
- 安全工程師如何克服考試心理壓力試題及答案
- 小學(xué)教師反思與家庭教育的互動關(guān)系試題及答案
- 大學(xué)高級office期末試題及答案
- 邢臺中考考試卷及答案
- 軟件工程實(shí)驗(yàn)報告 概要設(shè)計
- 心衰評估量表
- 2023年08月甘肅省農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院公開招聘30人筆試歷年難易錯點(diǎn)考題薈萃附帶答案詳解
- 應(yīng)用翻譯-華東交通大學(xué)中國大學(xué)mooc課后章節(jié)答案期末考試題庫2023年
- 大學(xué)生性健康教育智慧樹知到答案章節(jié)測試2023年南昌大學(xué)
- 2、圓口綱完整版課件
- JB/T 20173-2016輥壓干法制粒機(jī)
- 外科護(hù)理學(xué)題庫(中專)
- DB2110T 0004-2020 遼陽地區(qū)主要樹種一元、二元立木材積表
- 建設(shè)工程施工項目每日“防高墜三檢”檢查記錄表
- 住建部《建筑業(yè)10項新技術(shù)(2017版)》解讀培訓(xùn)課件
評論
0/150
提交評論