夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人2015年12月大學(xué)英語四級考試題（第三套PartIWriting(30minutes)Forthisyou30minutestowriteanon“Nevergoouttheretoseewhathappens,gotheretomakethingshappen.”Youcantoillustrateimportanceparticipantsrathermereonlookersinlife.shouldwriteat120PartⅡ

(25minutes)（說明：由于12六級考試全國共考了套聽力，本套真題聽力與前2套內(nèi)容完全一樣，只是順序不一樣，因此在本套真題中不再重復(fù)出現(xiàn)）PartⅢ

(40minutes)SectionAInthisthereapassagewithforeachblankfromachoicesinawordbankfollowingthecarefullyyourchoices.choiceinthebankisidentifiedletter.PleasetheletterforeachitemonAnswerSheetwithsinglelinenotuseofinbankmore26to35ondothinkwaydo.Forofthefirstyearoflife,ifsomethingisoutofsight,it’soutofmind.Ifyoucoverababy’swithofthebabythinkshasstopslookingforAmaythatsisteritisonlytheofthethatdiffer,the28ofYetinLikegoodchildrenarealwaystheirchild-sized29aboutthingsspoononthefloorforasyoutrytofeedher,“That’senough!Iwillnotpickupyourspoonagain!”thewill30yourclaim.youyouwillifthespoonSheisnottodrive31;rather,isthat夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人candiffer,thatsometimesthose32aretheynot.Howandwhydoeschildren’sthinkingchange?Inthe1920s,SwisspsychologistJeanPiagetthatchildren’s(認(rèn)的abilitiesunfold,likeofofwhat34inmanyofspecificconclusionshavebeenmodifiedoveryears,ideasthousandsofbyinvestigatorstheworld.advocateamountdefinitedifferencesfavorite

ImmediatelyObtainingPrimarilyProtestH)happeningSectionBInyouaretenit.inofparagraphs.Identifytheparagraphfromwhichtheinformationisderived.Youchooseaparagraphthanonce.paragraphmarkedathemarkingcorrespondingletteronAnswerSheet2The[A]Lookingonofeducation,Iidentifyoneteacher.Shemylife,evenIdidn’t.Herwere—Sheanalsomother.[B]Whenstudentsinanessay,theytheirreturningitthemsameforsinglewordaddedintheofthefinalpage:“Flawless.”Thisdreamcametrueformeoneafternoontheninthgrade.OfIheardgeniuscouldshowanearlyIwasslightlytakenabackthatIhadattenderageof14.Obviously,Ididanywriterwoulddo;IofftospreadthegoodIgetveryfar.ThefirstItoldmymother.夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人[C]Mymother,justshyoffivefeettall,isnormallyincrediblybutontherareshegotterrifying.Isureifshebyhubris得意忘形)orbyfactthatmyteacherhadletgetsooutofInanyevent,myherredmehowdeeplyflawedaessaycouldAttime,Iamsureshethoughtshewas(),structure,andvoice.ButIlearned,withthroughmyteachingHarvard,adeeperlessontheofcriticism.[D]off,ithurts.thatonasawriter,alsoleavesexistentialimprint(印記)youaperson.Iheardwritercriticismpersonally.Isaythatshouldtothesepeople.[E]Criticism,atitsdeeplypersonal,andgetstoofwhywewaywedo.Theintimatenatureofgenuinecriticismimpliestogivesomeonewhoknowswellyouyourlifeinthewayofgoodwriting.Conveniently,arethepeopleenoughseeyouthroughpainfulmeittheformofmyfirst,andIhopeonly,encounterwithwriter’sblock—Iwasnotabletoproduceforthreeyears.[F]FranzKafkaoncesaid:“Writingutter獨處,descentintoabyss(深淵ofoneself.”Mymother’scriticismmethatKafkarightthecoldabyss,andwhenmaketheintrospective(內(nèi)省的)hatfollowed,sustainedthatbewrongthesolitude.Iluckyenoughtoacriticandwaswillingtomakethejourneyofwritingwithme.“Itisathingofnogreatdifficulty,accordingtoPlutarch,“toraiseobjectionsagainstanotherman’sspeech,itisaeasybuttoainworktroublesome.”Iamsurewroteessaysinlateryearsofhighschoolwithoutmymother’sguidance,Ican’trecallthem.WhatIhowever,ishowshetookupthe“extremelyworkofongoingcriticism.[G]Therearetwointerprethethatcriticshould夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人abletoproduce“abetterinitsplace.”Inastraightforwardhecouldmeanthatcriticbemoretalentedthanshecritiques(評論.Mywaswellcoveredoncount.ButperhapsPlutarchissuggestingslightlydifferent,somethingabitcloserMarcusCicero’sclaimthatshould“criticizebycreation,notbyfindingfault.”criticismaopeningforauthortoonhis—aprocessthatisbutalmostmeaningful.[H]Mysaidshemewithwriting,butfirstItohelpmyself.ForeachIwastotheIcould.criticismnotmeantfindobviousifsheany—thetypeIcouldonmy—Itofromscratch.Fromscratch.thewas“flawless,”wouldtakeaneveningwalkthroughmyerrors.Thattruecriticism,thethatchangedmeasaperson,began.[I]ShewhenIreferencesjargon行話).forbrilliantbutirrelevantfiguresof“Writerscan’tbluff(虛張聲勢)theirwaythroughignorance.ThatwasnewstomeIwouldtoanothertomydaily[J]backmyflowerydrewexclamationforofrestraintinexpression.“John,”shealmostwhispered.Ileanedintoher:“Ican’thearyouwhenyoushoutatme.”SoIbluffing,andslowlywritingimproved.[K]alongwayIsetmyofButperhapsImissedsomethingimportantinmymother’slessonsaboutcreativityandperfection.pointwritingthewasnottogiveup,towillinglyWhitman“SongofMyself”between18551891.Repeatedly.Wedoourbestwithpieceofwriting,aswecanideal.forthetimebeing,weInareforcedtodepart,touptheweforthechanceevenalittlebitbetter.ThisistheItookfrommymother:Ifwereitmotivating.36.Theauthoradvisedagainsttheimproperuseoffiguresofspeech.夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人eauthor’smothertaughtalessonbyoutofflawsinhisseeminglyperfectessay.Awriterhiswritingrepeatedlyastocloserperfection.mayexperienceperiodsoftimeintheirlifewhencan'tanything.Theauthorwasnotmuchhisschoolteachermarkedas“flawlessCriticizingsomeonespeechsaidtobeeasierthancomingupwithabetterone.42.Theauthorlooksuponhishisandcaringinstructor.Thecriticismtheauthorfrommotherhimaperson.TheauthorgraduallyhiswritingbyfancyConstructiveanauthoragoodstarttoimprovehisSectionC2inthissection.Eachpassageisfollowedquestionsorstatements.ForeachthemtherearefourchoicesB),C),andD).YoudecidebestandmarktheletteronAnswerwithasingleassageOneuestions46toyouSiliconValleyelsewhere,thereuniqueit?Itwouldn’tbesurprisingifitwerehardtoreproduceincountries,youcouldn’treproduceitinmostoftheUSeither.WhatittomakeSiliconIt’stherightpeople.IfyoucouldtherightthousandpeoplefromSiliconValleytoBuffalo,BuffalowouldbecomeValley.Youneedtwooftocreateahub(心):rich(癡迷科研的人.Observationout.townsbecomestartupififtheyhavebothrichnerds.startupsinMiami,forexample,becausealthoughit’sfullofrichpeople,ithasfewIt’snotthekindofnerdslike.WhereasPittsburghtheoppositeproblem:plentynerds,norichpeople.ThetopUSComputerSciencesaidtobeMIT,Stanford,Berkeley,Carnegie-Mellon.MITRoute128.StanfordBerkeleySilicon夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人Valley.ButwhatdidCarnegie-MelloninPittsburgh?whatinhomeofCornellwhichisalsohighlist?IgrewupinPittsburghandwenttocollegeatCornell,Icanforboth.Theweatheristerrible,particularlyinwinter,andthere’snointerestingoldcitytomakeforit,asisRichdon’wanttoinorSowhileplentyof(電迷)couldstartstartups,therenoonetoinvestthem.Doyoureallyneedtherichpeople?Wouldn’titworktohavethegovernmentinvestinNo,itwouldnot.Startupinvestorstypeofrichpeople.Theytohavealotofintechnologyhelpsthestartups,theycansupplyaswellmoney.Andthefactthathaveinthethempayattention.46.WhatdoweSiliconValleyfromItsishardtoanywhereItbiggesthubtheItsfameintechnologyincomparable.Itleadsininformation47.WhatMiamiunfittoproduceSiliconValley?Lackofincentiveforinvestment.Lackofoftalents.LackofLackofuniversities.48.InwhatCarnegie-MellondifferentfromMIT?Itsnotastorichpeople.ItssciencedepartmentsnotnearlyasItdoesnotproducecomputerhackersandnerds.Itdoesnotattentiontostartups.49.WhatdoestheauthorimplyBoston?IthaspleasantweatherItaswellhigh-tech.ItnottoattractlotsItanoldcitymanysitesofhistoricalinterest.50.Whatdoestheauthorsaystartupinvestors?TheyareespeciallyinmakingTheygoodconnectionsintheTheycanmoreproviding夢想不會辜負(fù)每一個努力的人D)Theyrichenoughtoinnerds.assageTwouestions51toIt’snicetohavepeopleoflikemindaround.Agreeablepeopleboostyourconfidenceandallowtofeelcomfortable.Unfortunately,comfortcantheverylearningthatcanexpandyourcompanyandyourcareer.It’snicetohavepeopleagree,butyouneedconflictingperspectivesdigoutthetruth.Ifeveryoneyouhassimilarviews,yourworkwillsufferfromconfirmation(偏頗).Takeatnetwork.Doyourcontactsshareofviewmostsubjects?yes,’stimetoshakethingsaleader,itcanchallenginganinwhichwillfreelyargue,FromcomesIt’snoteasyformostpeopletoactivelyseekconflict.Manyspendtheirtryingtoavoidarguments.There’snoneedgooutandfindpeopleyouate,youtosomeself-assessmentdetermineyoubecomeinyourthinking.needtostartyournetworkyouidentifyyourblindspots.Passionate,doesnottobeeffective.itdoesyouhaveopponents,setsomegroundresponsibilitiesboundaries.objectiveofdebatingisnotwintothetruththatwillyoutomovefaster,better.Fiercecanhurtfeelings,involved.sureyouinwithopponentsthatarenottheemotionofbattlesbeyondthebattlefield.thewithsmilesandtoreinforcethatthisfriendlydiscoursethatallworkingtowardgoal.Rewardinvolv