competition-model_第1頁
competition-model_第2頁
competition-model_第3頁
competition-model_第4頁
competition-model_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩14頁未讀, 繼續免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、Internal Factors in SLA 1. Introduction 2. Theoretical Framework 3. Competition Model and SLA 4. Advantage and Defect5. Conclusion 1. Introduction The competition Model is proposed by Mac- Whinney, Bates and Kligell. Like other funcitionalist models, the Competition Model is a performance not a comp

2、etence model. it seeks to account for the kind of knowledge that underlies real-time processing in real-world language behavior.1. Introduction According to Competition Model, the learners grammer is viwed as an emergent property resulting from interaction between input and cognitive mechanisms rela

3、ting to perceptual abilities, channel capacity, and memory.2. Theoretical Framework 2.1 Form-function Mappings 2.2 Cue 2.3 Cue Competition 2.4 Cue Strength2. Theoretical Framework The core idea of Competition Model is Form-function Mappings. As MacWhinney, Bates and Kligell put it: The forms of natu

4、ral languages are created, governed, and constrained, acquired and used in the service of communicative functions. 2.1 Form-function Mappings2. Theoretical Framework 2.1 Form-function MappingsLanguagefunctional levelformal levelcommunicative intentionsurface formagent, patient, topicmorphology, word

5、 order2. Theoretical Framework 2.1 Form-function Mappings communicationproduction of languageinterpretation of languageformal levelfunctional levelformal levelfunctional level2. Theoretical Framework 2.1 Form-function Mappings Any one form may realize a number of functions and, conversely, any one f

6、unction can be realized through a number of forms. The learners task is to discover the particular form-function mappings that characterize the target language.2. Theoretical Framework 2.2 Cue Form-function mappings can be achieved by a lot of cues or devices. There are four types cues. 1) Phonology

7、: stress e.g. Sam hit Jerry on the side, and he squashed Tony into the pool. 2) Morphonogy: number, case, agreement e.g. Money they like. 2. Theoretical Framework 2.2 Cues 3) Syntax: word order e.g. Mary kissed John. 4) Semantics: animacy e.g. This book Mary likes a lot.2. Theoretical Framework 2.3

8、Cue Competition Any one language is likely to utilize several devices for signaling a particular function, which results in the cue competition. e.g. That lecturer we like a lot.t h e s t r o n g e s t candidate for agent the weakest candidate for angent2. Theoretical Framework 2.3 Cue Competition T

9、he task facing the L2 learner is to discover 1) which forms are used to realize which functions in the L2 2) what weights to attach to the use of individual forms in the performance of specific functions.2. Theoretical Framework 2.4 Cue Strength The cue strength is determinged by several factors: 1)

10、 cue reliability The extent to which a cue always maps the same form on to the same function 2) cue availability How often the cue is available in the input. 3) conflict validity Whether a cue wins or loses when it appears in the competitive environment.2. Theoretical Framework 2.4 Cue Strength McDo

11、nald proposed a learning-on-error model, which attempts to specify how learners use the information available from cues to construct their language systems. This model suggests that weights attached to specific form-function mappings are changed when the learner interprets an input cue incorrectly a

12、nd is subsequently provided with feedback. This may account for the developmenal shift noted in the L1 acquisition from an initial dependence on cue reliability/ availability to dependence on conflict validity. 3. Competition Model and SLA Competition Model framework provides several tools for under

13、standing second language learning. First, the underlying functionalists model of language processing makes direct predictions about the input on the course of acquisition of specific structures in comprehension and production. Second, it emphasizes the role of transfer, automatization, and parasitis

14、m in learning of the L2. Advantage4. Advantage and DefectDefect This model provides the convincing account of the number of aspects of L2 acquistion includ- ing the role of the L1, the effect of input and the gradual way in which native-like ability is acquired.The main weakness of the model is over-reliance on rather artificial interpreta- tion tasks.5. Conclusion The Competition Model is a psycholinguistic theory of language acquisition and sentence processing. It has been investigated by means of experimental syudies which elicited

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論