《經(jīng)濟學(xué)與法律的對話》課 17 Value of Life_第1頁
《經(jīng)濟學(xué)與法律的對話》課 17 Value of Life_第2頁
《經(jīng)濟學(xué)與法律的對話》課 17 Value of Life_第3頁
《經(jīng)濟學(xué)與法律的對話》課 17 Value of Life_第4頁
《經(jīng)濟學(xué)與法律的對話》課 17 Value of Life_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩24頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

GameTheoryTheProblemofStrategicBehaviorWhatIdodependsonwhathedoesand…ViceversaWhatVonNeumannWasTryingtoDoAgeneralsolutiontostrategicbehaviorhoweachplayershouldplayAndwillplay,beingrationalAndassumingtheotherplayersareAsolutionthatwouldcoverEconomicsPoliticsforeignpolicypoker,…ButwhatheactuallydidwasTwoPlayerFixedSumGameFixedSum:WhathelpsmehurtsyouStrategy:AfulldescriptionofwhatIwilldoinanysituationIncluding“flipacoin,ifheadsdoA,iftailsdoB”Consider”scissorspaperstone”wherebeingpredictablelosesSolutionconcept:ApairofstrategiessuchthateachisbestagainsttheotherDoesnotincludethebenefitofstealingcandyfrombabiesVonNeumanndemonstratedhowtofindthesolutionforanysuchgameProvided,ofcourse,thatyouhaveunlimitedcomputingpowertodoitwithScissorsPaperStoneThesolution:Rolladieoutofsightofyouropponent1-2scissors,3-4paper,5-6stoneWhateveryourstrategy,Iwin1/3rd,lose1/3rd,tie1/3rdAveragepayoutzeroIfyoufollowthesamestrategy,whateverIdogetsthesameaveragepayoutSoaVonNeumannsolutionAnditdoesnotmatterifyouknowmystrategyAslongasyoucan’tseethedieAndsimilarlyifIknowyoursWhichistrueingeneralofaVNsolutionManyPlayerNotFixedSumVNSolutionconcept:Asetofoutcomes(whogetswhat)SuchthatanyoutcomenotinthesetisdominatedbyoneinthesetWhereoneoutcomeisdominatedbyanotherifThepeoplewhopreferit(getmoreinit)Aresufficient,workingtogether,togetitTheremaybemanydifferentsolutionsEachcontainingmanyoutcomesSoa“solution”inaveryweaksenseThreePlayerMajorityVote:Allocating$1Solution:(.5,.5,0),(0,.5,.5)(.5,0,.5)ConsideranyotherallocationofthedollarThereisalwaysoneofthesethattwopeoplepreferSoeveryotherallocationisdominatedbyoneoftheseSolution:(.1,x,.9-x)forallvaluesof0>x>.9Alsoasolution,butonethatincludesAninfinitenumberofallocationsTrytofindanallocationthatisn’tdominatedbyonememberofeitherthefirstorthesecondsetofallocationsBilateralMonopolySellinganapplePuttingachildtobedADoomsdayMachineTheHumanDoomsdayMachineDefertomeorIbeatyouupAfighthurtsbothofus,but…Youdon’twanttobehurt,soIdon’thavetobeatyouupHawk/DovegameEquilibriumnumberofhawksWhycrimesofpassioncanbedeterredEconomicsofViceandVirtueEconomicsofvice:ThebullystrategyEconomicsofvirtueWhyaretherepeoplewhowon’tstealEveniftheyaresurenobodyislooking?Whatifyourutilityfunctionwaswrittenonyourforehead?ThecosttomeofhiringsomeonewhowillstealfrommeIsgreaterthanthebenefittohimofstealingfrommeSoIwillpaythehonestmanmorethanenoughmoresothathonestypaysYourutilityfunctioniswrittenonyourforeheadWithafuzzypencilSohonestypaysUnlessyouareaverytalentedconmanImplicationoftheeconomicsThebullystrategyonlyworksforinvoluntaryinteractionsIfyouannounceattheemploymentinterviewthatyoubeatpeopleupiftheydon’tdowhatyouwantYoudon’tgetthejobThevirtuestrategyonlyworksforvoluntaryinteractionsSoasocietywheremoreinteractionisvoluntarywillhavelessviceandmorevirtue.NicerpeoplePrisoner’sDilemmaMikeConfessSayNothingJoeConfess2years,2years3months,5yearsSayNothing5years,3months6months,6monthsDominanceasasolutionconceptifchoiceAisbetterformethanchoiceBWhatevertheotherplayerdoesThenAdominatesB“Confess”dominates“SayNothing”forbothcriminalsSotheyget2yearseachinsteadof6monthseachRepeatedPrisoner’sDilemmaWithafixednumberofplaysBothCriminalsknowtheywillbetrayonthelastroundSo…AgoodreasonnottogetintothatgameConsiderPleaBargainingasaRealPrisoner’sDilemmaIfmostdefendantscopapleaTheD.A.canspendlotsofresourcesonthosewhodon’tWhichraisestherisktothosewhodon’tWhichmakesthosewhodowillingtoacceptworsetermsTheymightallbebetteroffgoingtotrialSincetheD.A.doesn’thavetheresourcestoconvictthemallSomeMoreApproachestoSolvingGamesNashEquilibriumEachplayerisactingoptimally,givenwhateveryotherplayerisdoingThisassumeswecanfreezetheotherplayerswhileIadjustmystrategyButwhatdoes“freeze”mean?ConsiderOligopoly:AfewfirmsincompetitionWhenIincreasemyoutputTheotherfirmscannotkeepbothpriceandquantityfixedBecausealargerquantity(duetomyincrease)impliesalowerpriceIfweassumetheyholdquantityfixedwegetoneequilibriumIfweassumetheyholdpricefixed,adifferentequilibriumSotheoutcomedependsonhowwedefineastrategySubgamePerfectEquilibriumAsequentialgameFirstImakeachoicethenyoumakeachoicethenCouldbemorethantwoplayersAndeachsequenceofchoicesendswithapayoffforeachplayerGotothelastchoice,assumethechoosertakesthebranchthatgiveshimthehigherpayoff.Crossofftheotherbranch.NowthegameisonestepshorterRepeatasyougobackupthediagramBut…TheTantrumGameCommitmentStrategiesMatterAndkidshavethemtooImplicationsWehavesolvednothingharderthanscissorspaperstoneButlearnedsomeusefulwaysofthinkingaboutstrategicbehaviorCommitmentstrategiesmatterBilateralmonopolywithawiderangemaybeexpensiveCrimesofpassionaretosomedegreedeterablePleabargainingmaymakeaveragesentenceshigherTheValueofLifeWemeasurevaluetoyoubyourchoicesYouwouldnotsellyourheartforamilliondollarsNotevenabillionDoesthatmeanthatthevalueoflifeisinfinite?Ifso,ornot,whataretheimplications?ForbuildingbridgesandhighwaysPayingformedicalproceduresAwardingdamagesfortortiouslossoflifeAndlivingInfiniteRelativetoWhat?Relativetosomethingofvalue,noOrwewouldallhavemuchsaferlivesthanwedoAlsomoreboringRelativetodollarstoadeadman,yesTheissueisnotmultiplyingbyinfinityButdividingbyzero1,000,000/0=∞

HowMightWeMeasuretheValueofLife?IncomepremiumforariskofprofessionPricepeoplewillpayforadditionalsafetyWhatifthebestsurgeoncostsmorethanthegoodsurgeon?MeasuredbyrevealedpreferenceThechoiceswemakeHowMightWeUsetheInformation?HighwaydesignDeathpanels–WhatMedicarewillpayforFDAdrugapproval?Tradeoffs:Morelife,lessmoney,risksTortdamagesfortortlossoflifeHowwenowdoitBasedonthevalueofyourlifetoeveryonebutyouHowweshoulddoit—standardPigouvianargumentHedonicdamagesTortDamagesforLossofLife:TheProblemAdamagepaymentplaystworolesThedisincentivetotheinjurerCompensationtothevictimThereisnoreasontoexpecttheoptimalsumtobethesameforbothInthecaseoflossoflife,“compensation”islifeinsuranceThefactthatIdon’twantany(nowifeorchildren,orIamalreadywealthy)DoesnotmeanthatmylifeisofnovaluetomeThesolutionBasedamagesonthevalueofmylifetomeandLetmeselllifeinsuranceonmyselfIcanthenspendthemoneyinthefuturewhereIamnotkilledSothevalueismeasuredindollarswhenIamalive,andfiniteAMarketinInchoateTortsWhatIamsellingisonlylifeinsuranceifIamtortuouslykilledSoitisreallymytortclaimforatortthathasnotyethappenedTherearetworeasonswhythiscan’tbedoneatpresentDamagesawardedarenotbasedonthevalueofmylifetomeAndtortclaimscannotbesoldinadvanceOrsoldatall,saveinafewlimitedcasesContingencyfeeforalawyerSellingtheclaimtothedefendant—anoutofcourtsettlementOtherAdvantagestoMakingTortClaimsMarketableProtectingthepoor—whocannotaffordalawyerThatwasthesysteminsagaperiodIcelandWhereallprosecutionandenforcementwereprivateKillsomeone,hisrelativessueyouOurlegalsystemisonlyathousandyearsbehindtheirsFindingtherightlawyerThepoorplaintiffmightfindafirmtotakethecaseonacontingencybasisButhowdoesheknowwhichfirmwilldothebestjob?TheonethatoffersthehighestpriceforhisclaimMoreadvantagestobediscussedlaterDamagesforInjuryLosingyourvisionlowersbothYourutilityandYourabilitytoturndollarsintoutilesFullycompensatingyouexpostMaybeimpossibleAndtransfersfromhighMUItolowMUITheblindbillionaireproblemButwecouldfullycompensateexanteJustaswithlossoflifeBylettingyousellasmuchofthedamagesasyouwantinadvanceKeeptherestasinsuranceDamagesforInjuryinJewishandIslamicLawHowmuchisyourrightarmworth?WhatweneedisamarketAndtheyhadoneHowmuchwouldyoubeworthifsoldasaslavewithbotharms?Howmuchlesswithonlyonearm?ThedifferenceisthedamageforthelosstoyouofthearmMaimonidesincludedatermforpainandsufferingIfcondemnedtohaveyourhandcutoffHowmuchwouldyoupaytohaveitdoneunderdrugs(opium?)That’sho

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論