《經(jīng)濟學與法律的對話》課件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第1頁
《經(jīng)濟學與法律的對話》課件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第2頁
《經(jīng)濟學與法律的對話》課件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第3頁
《經(jīng)濟學與法律的對話》課件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第4頁
《經(jīng)濟學與法律的對話》課件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩13頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

MidtermOnthisexamMean:56StandardDeviation23Not90-100Aetc.VeryRoughProjectionA:80-100B:60-80C:40-60AnApplicationofEconomicstoExamsTheproblemAfteransweringthequestionsyouknowtheanswerto,tenminutesareleftSoyouwritesomethingontheonesyoudon’tknowtheanswertoThishasseveralcostsItwastesyourtimewritingitandminegradingitImightgivesomeonecreditforsomethinghereallydoesn’tknowbecauseheisgoodatfakingitImightfailtogivesomeonecreditforsomethinghedoesknow,becauseIthinkheisfakingitTheDelphicoraclesaidthatSocrateswasthewisestmaninAthensButSocratesknewhedidn’tknowanythingAftertalkingtoothersinAthens,heconcludethattheydidn’tknowanythingeitherButthoughttheydidMySolution:20%creditforknowingthatyoudon’tknowsomethingYougetitforleavingaquestionblankorwriting“Idon’tknow”ortheequivalentAppliesonlytoacompletequestion,notapart.Willapplyonthefinal.ConsidertheincentivesSomeGeneralIssuesonthisExamTalkingaboutthesubjectinsteadofansweringthequestion.WhenIcrossstuffoutitdoesn’tmeanitiswrongItmeansitisirrelevanttothequestionConfusingwhatisefficientwithwhatwillhappenorwhatisintheindividual’sinterestAnimportantmistake,sinceacentralproblemIshowtopreventsituationswherewhathappensisnotefficientForexampleproblemIBTheairlinedoesnotcontrolnoiseWhichisnottheefficientsolutionButisthesolutionthatresultsfromeachpartyactinginhisowninterestQuestionIA:Soundreduction,nosoundproofing.B.Airlinehastherighttomakesound,isnotliableIfnobargaining,airlinemakessound,homeownerssoundproof.Ifbargaining,homeownerscouldofferamillion+forsoundreductionButprobablywon’tbecauseoftheirpublicgoodproblemAnexampleofaninefficientoutcomefromrationalbehaviorC.Airlinereducessoundwithorwithoutbargaining.SomeseemedtothinkitcouldbargaintogetthehomeownerstopaypartofitButwhywouldthey?Ifitmakessound,theyarecompensated.D.Nowthepublicgoodproblemdisappears,sotheanswerchangesinB“Levelingtheplayingfield”isabadmetaphorItisaseriousmistaketothinkofeverythingasazerosumgameSometimeswhathelpsonepartyhurtstheotherButsometimesitbenefitsbothpartiesbyproducingamoreefficientoutcomeConsidercaseBWithmanyhomeowners,theairlinedoesn’treducenoiseWithonefirm,itispaidbetween$1,000,000and$1,200,000toreducenoiseWhichcostsitonly$1,000,000SobothsidesarebetteroffIfEverythingisZeroSumWhateverhelpsmemusthurtyouSoalldisagreementsareaboutWhichofusgetsthegoodiesExamplesofthemistakeIfChinagetsricher,wearelesscompetitive,whichisbadIftherichgetricherthepoormustgetpoorerAllpoliticaldisagreementsareaboutwhichsideyouareonrichorpoor,blackorwhite,AmericansorforeignersSoRepublicansandDemocratsareenemiesAndallisfairinloveandwarHusbandsandwivesareenemiestooConsiderimplicationsofthebeliefInsettlementnegotiationsIntradenegotiationsIninterpersonalrelationsAverydangerousmistakeQuestionIIRationality:IndividualstendtotaketheactionthatbestachievestheirobjectivesCouldaddthePosnerconjectureasoneapproachAndfiguringouttheconsequencesoflawasanotherButdon’thaveto“LegalIssuesthatithelpstounderstand”requiresThatitisalegalissue.“Whypeoplerobbanks”isnotalegalissueHowlawshouldpreventbankrobberiesisThateconomicstellssomethingwedidn’talreadyknowWealreadyknewwhypeoplerobbanksBecausethat’swherethemoneyisButwemightnotknowtheriskofgivinglifeimprisonmentforarmedrobberyOrtheargumentinfavorofpermittingconcealedcarryWhatmattersisnotifthevictimusuallydefeatsthemugger,butIfithappensoftenenoughtomakemuggingunprofitableQuestionIIIInthePrisoner’sDilemmaitdoesn’tmatterwhattheothercriminaldoesYouarebetteroffconfessingwhetherornothedoesAdominantstrategy,notjustaNashequilibriumApplicationsmightincludeRealizingthatpermittingpleabargainingmaynotreduceaveragesentencesOthercaseswhereindividualrationalitydoesnotproducegrouprationality,forsimilarreasonsMultiplelandholdersoveroneoilpoolOverfishingNobodydidbilateralmonopoly.Ifsomeonehad…TheproblemwithinjunctiveremediesthatcreatealargebargainingrangeTheargumentforlongtermcontractsWhichwewillgetintowhendiscussingmarriageQuestionIVThelackoftroutisanegativeexternalityAslongasanyonelikestofishthereforanyreasonThatisacost.Butwhatistheinefficiencythatresults?ThepriceofAluminumisbelowitsrealcostofproductionSosomepeopleusealuminumwhen,allcostsconsidered,itwouldbecheaperTousesteelorwoodorfiberglassor…AnetlossAlternatively,Idon’tcoolmyfactoryinsomeotherwayThatwouldhaveavoidedtheproblemAndwouldcostmelessthanitsavesthefishermenWarmwatercouldalsobeapositiveexternalityAsafewstudentspointedout,possiblyallswimmersInwhichcasethepriceofaluminumcouldbeinefficientlyaboveitsrealcostofproductionLoweringthepriceofaluminumisapecuniaryexternalityAnegativeexternalitytocompetitors,positivetotheircustomersThetwoeffectscancel,soitdoesnotproduceaninefficiencyWorkersworking,aluminumbeingconsumed,arecostsButtheyarenotexternalcosts,becauseYouhavetopayforbothSotakethemintoaccountinyourdecisionsQuestionVRiskaversionisnotaboutpresentvsfuturebutaboutyoubeingrichorpoorRiskpreferringdoesn’tmeanyoulikeriskThatyouwouldchoosetoflipacoin,headsyouloseathousanddollar,tailsyoudon’t.Onlythatyoulikeacoinflipwhereheadsyouloseathousand,tailsyouwinathousand.Whatdoriskaverse,riskneutral,andriskpreferringmeanInmoneyInlifeIngradesRiskaversioninmoneyisduetodecliningmarginalutilityofincomeAndthatdoesnotimplydecliningmarginalutilityofyearsorgradesExanteexpostquestion:DeathsvsDentsOnemajorproblemwithexpostishavingtoimposelargepunishmentsIftheonlyresultisdenting,thatisunnecessarySoapureexpostsystemmakesmuchmoresensethanifaccidentskillInterestingbutnotentirelycorrectanswerExpostdoesn’tworkifaccidentskill,becauseYoucan’tpunishadeadmanYoucouldstillpunishadriverforanaccidentthatkillssomeoneelseMoreinteresting,therearewaysofpunishingadeadmani.e.thingshappeningafterhediesthat,before,hedoesn’twanttohappenRefusingtoburyasuicideinconsecratedgroundisatraditionalsolutionConfiscatinghispropertysothathiswifeandchildrenstarveKillingorpunishingpeoplehecaresaboutmoregenerallyPunishmentfortreasoninImperialChinaRelativesareexecutedorenslavedAfterall,weknowyoucanrewardadeadmanOtherwisenobodywouldbuylifeinsuranceItonlypayswhenheisdeadAndbuyingitmeanshevaluesnowthathappeningthenQuestionVIEconomicsofinsuranceRiskAversion=DecliningMUIOneimplicationisthatthefactthatpeoplebuyinsuranceisevidenceThatredistributivetaxationcanincreaseutilityAlthoughevidenceshortofproof—asevidenceusuallyisAdverseSelectionShowsareasonnottolimitinsurancecompanies’abilitytochargedifferentratestodifferentcustomersSinceifyoucan’tchargebadriskratestobadrisks,insuranceisapoordealforgoodrisksAndeveryoneendsuppayingbadriskpricesornotgettinginsuredAlsoanargumentforforcingpeopletobuyinsurancesoastopreventadverseselectionThevalueoflifeThevalueofmylifetomeislarge,asshownbymychoicesSodamagesfortortiouslossoflifeshouldincludeitHedonicdamagesButitisfinite,asshownbymychoices,soregulationsshouldnotbeinfinitelycautiousEconomicefficiencyTortdamagessufficienttomakethevictimwhole:TheargumentforPigouviantaxationThechoicebetweenpropertyrulesandliabilityrulesBotharewaysofmovinggoodstotheirhighestvalueduse,whichistheefficientoutcomeAndsometimesone,sometimestheother,doesitatlowercostAndForSomethingDifferentCoase’sFinalBook:HowChinaWentCapitalistStrikingfacts20foldincreaseinGDPpercapitafromMao’sdeathto2010.ShiftfromacommunisttoamostlycapitalistsystemWiththeCommunistPartystillincontrolMaostillrevered,socialismstilltheofficialideologyMao’spartofthestoryInfavorofdecentralization,criticalofStalin,butDidn’tknowhowtodoitThesolutiontothecoordinationproblemispricesandtradeAndheknewthatmustbewrongsincethatwouldbecapitalismSohisversionwaslotsofcommunes,mostlyself-sufficientThesystemoscillatedbetweencentralplanninganddecentralizationSincebothfailed,thesolutionmustbeculture,morale,somethinglikethat.TheGreatLeapForward,whichresultedinafaminethatkilledabout30millionpeopleAndthentheCulturalRevolutionWhathappenedafterMaodied?ManyhighstatuspeoplewhohadbeenpurgedcamebackTheyknewtheGreatLeapForwardandtheCulturalRevolutionweremistakesIndeedsomeofthemhadbeenpurgedforrecognizingthatAndtryingtopersuadeMaoNowtheycouldgoabroad,seetherealityofcapitalismAdeputypremierofChinavisitedEnglandObservedthataLondontrashcollectorhadseveraltimeshisincomeEnglandwouldbetheperfectcommunistcountryifitonlyhadacommunistpartyrunningitConclusion:Wemustbedoingsomethingwrongbutdon’tknowwhatTrylotsofthings,believeinthefactsAndwewillwinoutbecausesocialismisbetterPolicyafterMao’sdeathAttemptstoreformstaterunsector,givemorepowertofirmsMadesomeimprovement,but…Unwillingtogoalltheway,becauseHeavyindustryetc.waswhatmattered,soithadtobesocialistMeanwhile,inthemarginsCovertprivatizationoflandFirmsnominallyrunbylocalgovernments,permittedbutdisapprovedofVerysmallscaleprivateemploymentinthecities,tosoakupunemployedToleratedbecausenotimportantand…learnfromfactsTheSpecialEconomicZonesweredeliberatepolicyIntendedtolearnfromcapitalismwhilepreventingcontagionInitiallydoneinunimportantplaces.WhichrapidlybecameimportantSotheexceptiongraduallybecametheruleDualtrackpricing–govtfirmssoldtheirquotaattheofficialprice,butProductionabovethequotacouldbesoldatwhateverpricebuyerswouldpayGavegovernmentofficialsexperiencewithmarketswithinpublicsectorProvidedaccesstoresources,atacost,totheprivatesectorButalsoproducedinefficienciesandcorruptionCouldnottellifasuccessfulgovernmentfirmwaswellrunorjustgotfavorabletermsfromthegovernmentTheResultPrivatepracticeonthemarginswasverysuccessfulSofirstnotpunishedThenpermitted(agriculture)inparticularlyunsuccessfulplacesThenpushedeverywhereStateownedfirmslargelylosingmoney,atprovincialandlocallevelSomostofthemwereeventuallyprivatizedChinaendedupwithsomestatemonopoliesButmostproductionprivateGovernmentrevenueof~20%ofnationalincome,lowerthanintheU.S.Andtheyredefinedsocialismtob

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論